Implementation of Face-to-Face Learning after the Covid-19 Pandemic: Case Study at SD Muhammadiyah Pakel, Yogyakarta

Dewi Sarah Indah Harumi; Dholina Inang Pambudi

doi:10.56741/ijlree.v1i01.52

Authors

Dewi Sarah Indah Harumi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Dholina Inang Pambudi
dholina.pambudi@pgsd.uad.ac.id
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v1i01.52

Keywords:

Face-to-Face Learning, Covid-19 pandemic, Primary school, Muhammadiyah

Abstract

After the Covid-19 pandemic, SD Muhammadiyah Pakel has carried out face-to-face learning (PTM) directly in the classroom and still adheres to health protocols. In PTM, it is necessary to prepare planning, implementation, and evaluation, as well as supporting and inhibiting factors. This study aimed to determine face-to-face learning planning, performance, and assessment at SD Muhammadiyah Pakel Yogyakarta. It is descriptive qualitative research as well as knowing the supporting and inhibiting factors of NCD. The subject consists of the principal, the teacher of 3rd grade and 4th grade. The results showed that the planning the implementation of face-to-face learning includes planning goals, materials, learning activities, learning tools, methods, learning resource media, and evaluations had been carried out. The implementation of face-to-face learning includes face-to-face learning factors that affect class management. Formative and summative assessments are supporting elements and inhibiting factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dewi Sarah Indah Harumi, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Dewi Sarah Indah Harumi is an undergraduate student in the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program of Ahmad Dahlan University. Currently active in some student activities, especially for self-development. (email: dewi1800005314@webmail.uad.ac.id).

Dholina Inang Pambudi, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Dholina Inang Pambudi is a lecturer in the Elementary Teacher Training Department of Ahmad Dahlan University. She is active in teaching and writing journals, national and international proceedings, and community service. (email: dholina.pambudi@pgsd.uad.ac.id).

References

W. Samudera, “Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Bidang Pendidikan di Kota Mataram,” Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 154–158, 2020.

A. Biroli, “Adaptasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Pada Masa Pandemi Covid- 19 di MI Muhammadiyah Pagersari Mungkid Magelang,” Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2022.

R. Adawiyah, N. F. Isnaini and U. Hasanah, “Kesiapan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka pada Era New Normal di MI At-Tanwir Bojonegoro,” Jurnal basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3814–3821, 2021.

D. K. Elly Fitriyani and H. Purnamasari, “Evaluasi Kebijakan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) Terbatas Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Studi Kasus Pada SMP Negeri 2 Telukjambe Timur, Karawang Elly,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6358157.

I. Sholikhah, “Analisis Kesiapan Orang Tua Menghadapi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) di Masa Pandemi,” JIRA: Jurnal Inovasi dan Riset Akademik, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 2745–6056, 2021, doi: 10.47387/jira.v2i7.181.

E. N. Inah, “PERAN KOMUNIKASI DALAM INTERAKSI GURU DAN STUDENT,” Al-Ta’dib, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 150–167, 2015.

F. Fitriansyah, “Dinamika Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas Di Kalangan MahaStudent,” Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2022, doi: 10.37478/jpm.v3i1.1438.

A. D. Evitasari, A. D. Astuti, E. Rahmawati, and S. Utaminingtyas, “Pelatihan Pembuatan Media Boba (Belajar Online Bahagia) bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar Guna Menfasilitasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) Terbatas di SD Negeri Kasatriyan,” Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1007–1016, 2022.

W. Ningsih, “Tantangan Dan Kesulitan Guru , Orang Tua Dan Student Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka pada Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19,” Mafahim: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 5, pp. 1–7, 2022.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kuntitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Bandung:Alfabeta, 2019.

A. M. Miles and M. B. Hubermen, Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2014. doi: Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.

M. M. Pratiwi, D. Ayu, and Y. U. Lawe, Perencanaan Pembelajaran. 2021.

M Sobry Sutikno, Strategi Pembelajaran. 2021.

S. Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi 3. 2021.

S. E. Nurhayati and N. Ratnaningsih, “Persepsi Orang Tua, Guru, dan Student Terhadap Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) Terbatas pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 827–835, 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1896.

E. Pattanang, M. Limbong, and W. Tambunan, “Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Di Masa Pandemi Pada Smk Kristen Tagari,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2021, doi: 10.33541/jmp.v10i2.3275.

M. Syarifuddin, “Model-model evaluasi pendidikan,” Jurnal Pendidikan & Konseling, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 38–50, 2018, doi: 10.24090/insania.v13i2.292.