Diffrentiated Learning to Improve Student Competencies

Iim; Suparman; Ika Maryani; Julita Lindriany

doi:10.56741/IISTR.jpes.001177

Authors

Iim
2437082012@webmail.uad.ac.id
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7249-4620
Suparman Universitas Ahmad Dahlan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-6285
Ika Maryani Universitas Ahmad Dahlan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-2902
Julita Lindriany Universitas Ahmad Dahlan https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8013-1029

Keywords:

Adaptive Instruction, Differentiated Learning, Inclusive Education, Personalized Learning, Student Competencies

Abstract

Differentiated learning is an instructional approach that customizes learning processes, content, and products according to students' diverse needs, interests, and readiness levels. This approach has emerged as a critical strategy for addressing classroom diversity and optimizing both academic and non-academic competencies. Despite growing interest, a systematic understanding of how differentiated learning enhances student competencies across varied educational contexts remains limited. This study employed a systematic literature review to examine the role of differentiated learning in improving student competencies. A comprehensive search across academic databases identified peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025. Selected studies underwent thematic analysis to identify implementation patterns, underlying principles, and effectiveness indicators of differentiated learning strategies. The analysis reveals that differentiated learning significantly enhances learning motivation, student engagement, and equitable competency achievement across diverse populations. Three critical success factors emerged: systematic diagnostic assessment to map individual learning needs, teacher flexibility and pedagogical skills in designing adaptive strategies, and robust institutional support for inclusive learning environments. Evidence indicates substantial improvements in both cognitive and affective learning outcomes when differentiation is properly implemented. Effective differentiated learning transcends mere pedagogical technique, requiring continuous professional development, collaborative school culture, and responsive formative assessment practices. The integration of student-centered approaches and ongoing evaluation mechanisms amplifies positive impacts on competency development. However, implementation challenges persist, including time constraints and resource limitations. This study confirms that differentiated learning represents a strategic, evidence-based approach for creating equitable and adaptive learning processes that sustainably improve student competencies across diverse educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Iim, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is currently pursuing her Doctoral Degree in Education at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. She is also actively working as a teacher at Muhammadiyah Tanjung Redeb Senior High School, where she is involved in classroom teaching, curriculum development, and various educational initiatives aimed at improving student learning outcomes. Her passion for education and commitment to professional development have led her to undertake doctoral studies to deepen her knowledge of educational theories, instructional strategies, and educational leadership. (email: 2437082012@webmail.uad.ac.id).

Suparman, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is a senior academic and Professor of Applied Mathematics at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. He is widely recognized for his contributions to mathematics education and the application of mathematics in solving real-world educational problems. With a career spanning several decades, he has mentored countless students and contributed to the development of innovative teaching methods in mathematics. His research interests include mathematical modeling, problem-solving strategies, curriculum development in math education, and digital tools for teaching mathematics. (email: suparman@pmat.uad.ac.id).

Ika Maryani, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is an Associate Professor at the Department of Doctoral Program in Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In 2022, she obtained her doctoral degree in educational studies, focusing on science education. Her research interests lie in teacher education, science education, higher education, and learning innovation. Her works have been published in books, articles, and proceedings at national and international levels. (email: ika.maryani@pgsd.uad.ac.id).

Julita Lindriany, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is a doctoral student in the Education Program at Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta. Her research interests include transformational leadership, Islamic education, educational technology, religious moderation, and the integration of artificial intelligence in character education. In addition to her academic pursuits, she serves as a permanent lecturer at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Muhammadiyah (STITM) Tanjung Redeb, East Kalimantan. Julita actively writes and presents her research at national and international conferences and is committed to promoting moderate, digitally integrated Islamic education in remote and underdeveloped regions of Indonesia. (email: 2437082010@webmail.uad.ac.id).

References

M. B. Tomlinson, and C. A. Imbeau, Leading and Managing a Differentiated Classroom. Ascd., 2023.

B. Ahearn, “Preparing Teachers to Differentiate Instruction: A Systematic Review,” University of North Dakota, 2024.

M. N. Suwarno, and M. Suprayogi, “Systematic Review of Differentiated Instruction Implementation in Higher Education,” Bangkok, Thailand: Bina Nusantara University, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR61386.2024.10875734

A. Kurnila, V. S., Juniati, D., and Lukito, “Implementation, Principles and Stages of Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics Learning: A systematic Literature Review.,” TEM Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-65

H. E. Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65528/9780807782224-023

E. Globio, “A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Impact of Differentiated Instruction on Student Achievement in Mathematics,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4897167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4897167

E. Groenewald, C. A. Groenewald, J. Valle, C. Viscara, F. Uy, and C. F. Abendan, “Examining the Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”, Int. Multidiscip. J. Res. Innov. Sustain. Excell. , vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2024, doi: https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/141.

M. Al Rashaida, W. Mohsen, S. Elhaj Ahmed, and R. Alhushki, “Teacher Perspectives on Differentiated Instruction for Students with SEN in UAE Classrooms,” Teacher Perspectives on Differentiated Instruction for Students with SEN in UAE Classrooms.

J. Hattie, Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542

Y. Goddard and M. Kim, “Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy,” Teach Coll Rec, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000102

L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Effective teacher professional development.,” Learning Policy Institute, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Assessment and classroom learning,” Assess Educ, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–74, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

C.-C. Liu, H.-J. Wang, D. Wang, Y.-F. Tu, G.-J. Hwang, and Y. Wang, “An interactive technological solution to foster preservice teachers’ theoretical knowledge and instructional design skills: A chatbot-based 5E learning approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 6698–6716, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2277761

J. Danandjaja, “Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Antropologi Indonesi Northouse, PG (2018),” Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i52.3318

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, 2017.

J. A. Luft, S. Jeong, R. Idsardi, and G. Gardner, “Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 21, no. 3, p. rm33, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134

C. Hart, “Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination,” 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036234454

C. A. Tomlinson, How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. Ascd, 2017.

I. R. Rahmawati, “Literasi matematis dan mathematical habits of mind peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika berorientasi kemampuan 4C,” 2022, STKIP PGRI PACITAN.

I. M. R. Jenyana and S. P. SD, “Pembelajaran yang Berdiferensiasi,” Inovasi Jurnal Guru, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 31–37, 2022.

M. Ningrum and R. Andriani, “Kurikulum merdeka belajar berbasis pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah,” EL Bidayah: Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 85–100, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33367/jiee.v5i1.3513

E. Rosa, R. Destian, A. Agustian, and W. Wahyudin, “Inovasi Model dan Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka: Inovasi Model dan Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka,” Journal of Education Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2608–2617, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1153

M. Astuti, L. Agustin, M. Y. Alhusaini, T. Anggraini, and S. Adellia, “Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Perspektif Merdeka Belajar,” Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i1.2326

A. Z. Sarnoto, “Model pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam kurikulum merdeka,” Journal on Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 15928–15939, 2024.

K. Kamar, M. Asbari, A. Purwanto, W. Nurhayati, E. Agistiawati, and R. N. Sudiyono, “Membangun karakter siswa sekolah dasar melalui praktek pola asuh orang tua berdasarkan genetic personality,” JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v6i1.10196

P. B. Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, “Pengaruh Parenting Style dan Personality Genetic terhadap Pengembangan Pedidikan Karakter Anak di PAUD Islamic School,” Quality, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 51, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6606

Y. S. W. Dari, N. T. Rachmadani, A. K. Wahdi, A. Cahyani, R. Gusman, and M. Asbari, “Growing historical awareness among the young generation of the Indonesian nation,” Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 43–52, 2022.

R. Siringoringo, M. Asbari, and C. Margaretta, “Strategi Pembelajaran Berdiferensi: Akselerasi Meningkatkan Potensi Peserta Didik,” Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 13–16, 2023.

B. Paju, A. Kajamaa, R. Pirttimaa, and E. Kontu, “Collaboration for Inclusive Practices: Teaching Staff Perspectives from Finland,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 66, pp. 427–440, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00313831.2020.1869087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869087

F. Dubé, M. Gareau, and S. Lanoix, “Implementing Collaborative and Differentiated Instruction in Middle School,” Education and New Developments, 2023, doi: 10.36315/2023v1end100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.0149

Ö. Çoban, N. Özdemir, and M. Bellibaş, “Trust in Principals, Leaders’ Focus on Instruction, Teacher Collaboration, and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Testing a Multilevel Mediation Model,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 51, pp. 95–115, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1741143220968170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220968170

C. Granberg, T. Palm, and B. Palmberg, “A Case Study of a Formative Assessment Practice and the Effects on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 68, p. 100955, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955

G. Reynders, J. Lantz, S. Ruder, C. Stanford, and R. Cole, “Rubrics to Assess Critical Thinking and Information Processing in Undergraduate STEM Courses,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5

Y. Chang, J. Choi, and M. Şen-Akbulut, “Undergraduate Students’ Engagement in Project-Based Learning with an Authentic Context,” Education Sciences, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14020168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020168

A. Ratnayake et al., “All ‘Wrapped’ Up in Reflection: Supporting Metacognitive Awareness to Promote Students’ Self-Regulated Learning,” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 25, 2023, doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00103-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00103-23