Differentiated Learning by Style Enhances Self-Regulation and Science Achievement in Fourth Grade Students
Keywords:
Differentiated Learning, Learning outcomes, Learning Styles, Self-RegulationAbstract
This study investigates the influence of differentiated instruction, tailored to students' learning styles, on self-regulation and science learning outcomes among fourth-grade elementary students. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved an experimental group that received differentiated instruction based on students’ learning styles through Project-based Learning (PjBL) model, and a control group taught through Problem-based Learning (PBL) model. Data were collected using validated instruments and analyzed using normality and homogeneity tests, as well as independent and paired sample t-tests, through SPSS version 30. Findings indicate that differentiated instruction significantly improved students’ science learning outcomes, as evidenced by a higher posttest mean score in the experimental group compared to the control group. Although the independent t-test showed a significant difference in self-regulation between the groups, the paired sample t-test did not reveal a significant increase in self-regulation within the experimental group itself. These results suggest that while differentiated instruction effectively enhances academic achievement in science, its impact on self-regulation is less pronounced. The study underscores the value of learner-centered instructional approaches that address individual learning differences to optimize educational outcomes in primary science education.
Downloads
References
S.-C. Kong and Y.-Q. Wang, “The impact of school support for professional development on teachers’ adoption of student-centered pedagogy, students’ cognitive learning and abilities: A three-level analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 215, p. 105016, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105016
W. Villegas-Ch, J. García-Ortiz, and S. Sánchez-Viteri, “Personalization of Learning: Machine Learning Models for Adapting Educational Content to Individual Learning Styles,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 121114–121130, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3452592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3452592
J. Jiao and N. B. Borbievna, “The impact of technology-based education in the Russian language on eagerness to learn, academic performance, and academic self-regulation in the conversation of Russian language curriculum,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 3597–3619, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12996-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12996-2
I. Maryani, M. A. Alhakim, and R. Gestiardi, “The student’s metacognitive skills of prospective primary school teachers,” Int. J. Educ. Manag. Innov., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 199, May 2021, doi: 10.12928/IJEMI.V2I2.3432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i2.3432
A. N. Dapa, “Differentiated Learning Model For Student with Reading Difficulties,” JTP - J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 82–87, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.21009/JTP.V22I2.15814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v22i2.15814
M. Kristiawan, N. Asvio, and W. Risanto, “Differentiated Learning : A Solution to Increase Students ’ Potential Seen from Students ’ Readiness to Learn, Interests and Learning Profiles,” JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 233–244, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v10i1.16751
A. S. Nazilah and F. Ferdianto, “Diagnostic Assessment in Differentiated Learning : Supporting Students ’ Needs for Enhanced Learning,” in Cirebon International Conference on Education and Economics (CICEE), 2024, pp. 140–145.
M. van Geel, T. Keuning, and I. Safar, “How teachers develop skills for implementing differentiated instruction: Helpful and hindering factors,” Teach. Teach. Educ. Leadership. Prof. Dev., vol. 1, p. 100007, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tatelp.2022.100007
M. van Geel, T. Keuning, J. Frèrejean, D. Dolmans, J. van Merriënboer, and A. J. Visscher, “Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 30, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013
T. H. S. Eysink and K. Schildkamp, “A conceptual framework for Assessment-Informed Differentiation (AID) in the classroom,” Educ. Res., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 261–278, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2021.1942118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1942118
H. Taş and M. B. Minaz, “The Effects of Learning Style-Based Differentiated Instructional Activities on Academic Achievement and Learning Retention in the Social Studies Course,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 21582440241249290, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241249290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249290
S. Demir, “Effects of learning style-based differentiated activities on gifted students’ creativity,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2021, doi: 10.17478/jegys.754104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.754104
I. Maryani and R. Dian, “How does online project-based learning inspire elementary school students’ learning motivation in science subjects?,” J. MIPA dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 183–192, 2023, doi: 10.17977/um067v3i4p183-192.
I. Maryani, D. R. Putri, S. Urbayatun, Suyatno, and C. P. Bhakti, “Metacognition and integrated-project-based learning (I-PjBL) in elementary schools,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1046–1054, 2020, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080339.
O. Haatainen and M. Aksela, “Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers’ perceptions and practices,” Lumat, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 149–173, 2021, doi: 10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392
K. J. Chua and M. R. Islam, “The hybrid Project-Based Learning–Flipped Classroom: A design project module redesigned to foster learning and engagement,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 289–315, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0306419019838335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419019838335
S. Koes-H and N. D. Putri, “The Effect of Project-Based Learning in STEM on Students’ Scientific Reasoning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1835, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006
Y. Rahmawati, Adriyawati, E. Utomo, and A. Mardiah, “The integration of STEAM-project-based learning to train students critical thinking skills in science learning through electrical bell project,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2098, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012040
F. Farcis, G. S. Budi, and E. Wijayanti, “Effect of Project-Based Learning and Science Literacy Ability on Critical Thinking Skills in Virtual Learning of the Thermodynamics Course,” JPPS (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Sains), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2022, doi: 10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p56-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p56-68
I. Maryani et al., “The Effect of The STEM-PjBL Model on The Higher-Order Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students,” Sekol. Dasar Kaji. Teor. dan Prakt. Pendidik., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 110–122, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.17977/UM009V30I22021P110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v30i22021p110
I. Maryani, U. Estriningrum, and Z. Nuryana, “Self-Regulated Learning and Creative Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students in the Distance Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Creat. Stud., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 496–508, 2023, doi: 10.3846/cs.2023.15278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.15278
I. Maryani, D. R. Putri, S. Urbayatun, Suyatno, and C. P. Bhakti, “Metacognition and integrated-project-based learning (I-PjBL) in elementary schools,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1046–1054, 2020, doi: 10.13189/UJER.2020.080339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080339
A. S. Rahayu and I. Maryani, “STEM-PjBL and creativity of science learning students in elementary schools,” J. Prof. Teach. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 72–83, 2023, doi: 10.12928/jprotect.v1i2.640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v1i2.640
M. Guven and B. Baldan Babayıgıt, “Self-Regulated Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students and the Role of Higher Education in Promoting Self-Regulation TT - Lisans Öğrencilerinin Öz Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Becerileri ve Öz Düzenlemeyi Desteklemede Yükseköğretimin Rolü,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 20, no. 89, pp. 47–70, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejer/issue/57497/815804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.89.3
B. J. Zimmerman and A. R. Moylan, Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect, Handbook. Routledge, 2009.
C. Haelermans, “The Effects of Group differentiation by students’ learning strategies,” Instr. Sci., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 223–250, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09575-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09575-0
B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2. Ohio State University Press, pp. 64–70, 2002. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
D. Sulisworo, M. Fitrianawati, I. Maryani, S. Hidayat, E. Agusta, and W. Saputri, “Students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) profile dataset measured during Covid-19 mitigation in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Data Br., vol. 33, p. 106422, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.DIB.2020.106422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106422
Erina, M. Zaini, and K. Kapsul, “The Quality of E-Student Worksheet on the Concept of Vertebrate Based on Critical Thinking Skill in Senior High School Level,” Islam. J. Integr. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2023, doi: 10.30762/ijise.v2i1.891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v2i1.891
J. W. Kooken, R. Zaini, and I. Arroyo, “Simulating the dynamics of self-regulation, emotion, grit, and student performance in cyber-learning environments,” Metacognition Learn., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 367–405, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11409-020-09252-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09252-6
E. Panadero, “A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, no. APR, p. 422, 2017, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00422/BIBTEX. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
M. Hanif, “The development and effectiveness of motion graphic animation videos to improve primary school students’ science learning outcomes,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 247–266, 2020, doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13416a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13416a
D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-Regulation and Learning,” in Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012, pp. 383–394. doi: 10.1002/9781118133880.hop207003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207003
B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
C. Coubergs, K. Struyven, G. Vanthournout, and N. Engels, “Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 53, pp. 41–54, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Edeh Dike Mariske, Adinda Tabyta Anggraini, Ika Maryani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









