Perceived Usefulness of Google Scholar for Literature Review and Intention to Use
Evidence From Rizal Technological Office Administration Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jmsd.001493
Keywords:
Academic Success, Digital Literacy, Google Scholar, Literature Review, Office Administration
Abstract
This study aims to examine the perceived usefulness of Google Scholar among Office Administration students in state universities, focusing on its role in conducting literature reviews. The research seeks to measure factors that drive students to use Google Scholar, associated with students' intentions to continue using the platform in their academic work. The study specifically gathered data from Office Administration students enrolled in state universities during the academic year 2024-2025. Findings from this research will contribute to improving digital literacy programs and enhancing students’ academic experience. The study revealed a significant correlation between the perceived usefulness of Google Scholar and students’ intention to use it. It shows that the multiple factors, such as efficiency in finding relevant sources, quick access to information, availability of up-to-date research, user-friendliness, and cost-free access, are associated with students' intention to use Google Scholar for their academic research, especially in finding literature reviews. The strong positive correlations across various aspects indicate that students who perceive Google Scholar as a useful tool are more inclined to integrate it into their research activities, prefer it over other academic databases, explore its advanced features, and recommend it to others. The findings show that while students find Google Scholar convenient and accessible, some struggle with navigation and accessing full-text articles. The study recommends further research on the platform’s long-term impact and how digital literacy affects its use. Future studies may explore whether targeted training improves students' research skills, offering insights for universities to better support academic success.
Downloads
References
Abad-García, M. F. (2019). Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 90(1), 57-e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2018.11.006
Pekdemir, E. (2018). Google Scholar through the eyes of academics. International Technology and Education Journal, 2(2), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71410/ESApub.ITEJ.2018.1
Zhang, Y., & Lun, H. (2019). Is Google Scholar useful for the evaluation of non‐English scientific journals? The case of Chinese journals. Learned Publishing, 32(2), 154-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1208
Oh, K. E., & Colón-Aguirre, M. (2019). A comparative study of perceptions and use of Google Scholar and academic library discovery systems. College & Research Libraries, 80(6), 876-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.6.876
Lavidas, K., Achriani, A., Athanassopoulos, S., Messinis, I., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020). University students’ intention to use search engines for research purposes: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2463-2479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10071-9
Levay, P., Ainsworth, N., Kettle, R., & Morgan, A. (2016). Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(1), 34-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1158
Sedgwick, P. (2012). Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Bmj, 345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4483
Tella, A., Oyewole, M., & Tella, A. (2017). An analysis of the perceived usefulness of Google Scholar by the postgraduate students of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.793
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, 10(9), e0138237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Panda, S., & Kushwaha, V. (2023). Google Scholar's contribution to scholarly pursuits: A comprehensive overview. In Digital Transformation in Libraries and Information Centres (pp. 193–211). Today & Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers.
Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Large coverage fluctuations in Google Scholar: A case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.07571.
A. I. Kayode, A. Tella, and S. O. Akande, “Ease-of-use and user-friendliness of cloud computing adoption for web-based services in academic libraries in Kwara State, Nigeria,” Internet Reference Services Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3–4, pp. 89–117, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2020.1837326
R. Bakı, B. Bırgoren, and A. Aktepe, “A meta-analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the adoption of e-learning systems,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 4–42, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471649
A. S. Almogren, W. M. Al-Rahmi, and N. A. Dahri, “Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 11, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887
G. Chen, S. Cao, P. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “An empirical study on the factors influencing users’ continuance intention of using online learning platforms for secondary school students by big data analytics,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, Art. no. 9508668, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9508668
J. Henseler, G. Hubona, and P. A. Ray, “Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 2–20, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cheska Nadine Rodriguez, Dianna Mae N. Tagapia, Rachell Mae R. Ureña, Jayvie O. Guballo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








