Structured Mentoring for Dissertation Proposal Development
A Community Service Model for Strengthening Research Capacity among Educators and Government Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jscd.002115
Keywords:
Community Service, Doctoral Education Mentoring, Professional Development, Research Capacity Building
Abstract
Research competence is a critical requirement for doctoral students and professionals pursuing advanced academic qualifications. However, many doctoral candidates from diverse professional backgrounds experience challenges in developing structured dissertation proposals due to limited research experience, methodological understanding, and academic writing skills. This community service program aimed to strengthen participants’ research capacity through a structured mentoring intervention conducted over two days on February 21–22, 2026. The participants included teachers, lecturers, and government professionals with diverse academic and professional backgrounds. The program utilized structured mentoring, guided practice, collaborative discussion, and iterative feedback. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach using observation, proposal document analysis, and participant reflections. The conceptual framework was based on adult learning theory, experiential learning, and research capacity development models. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in research problem formulation, conceptual framework development, proposal structure, and research confidence. Participant diversity was identified as both a challenge and an opportunity for collaborative learning. Structured mentoring proved effective in strengthening research competence across heterogeneous participant groups. This community service model provides a scalable and effective framework for research capacity development and can be implemented by higher education institutions to support doctoral students and professional researchers.
References
J. Creswell, C. N. Poth, and P. Rawlins, ‘Mapping Design Trends and Evolving Directions Using the Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Design’, Sage Handb. Mix. Methods Res. Des., pp. 527–537, 2023, doi: 10.4135/9781529682663.n50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682663.n50
P. D. Leedy and J. E. Ormrod, Practical Research Planning and Design (11th ed.), 2015. Boston, MA: Pearson.
H. M. Paterson, ‘How to Get A PHD - Managing the Peaks and Troughs of Research, Estelle M. Phillips and D. S. Pugh (Open University Press, 1987), pp. xii + 161, £25.00 and £8.95’, Scott. Educ. Rev., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 127–129, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1163/27730840-02002020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-02002020
B. E. Lovitts, ‘Leaving the Ivory Tower’, 2002, doi: 10.5040/9798216409847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216409847
D. Rodriguez-Segura, C. Campton, L. Crouch, and T. S. Slade, ‘Looking beyond changes in averages in evaluating foundational learning: Some inequality measures’, Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 84, p. 102411, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102411
J. Rath, ‘Research Mentoring in Higher Education’, SAGE Handb. Mentor. Coach. Educ., pp. 506–519, 2012, doi: 10.4135/9781446247549.n34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247549.n34
M. Ayoobzadeh, ‘Peer-mentoring and doctoral student retention: a longitudinal investigation’, High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 513–529, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2106948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2106948
A. Bandura, 'Social Learning Theory’, in Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010. doi: 10.4135/9781412959193.n17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959193.n17
N. Hopwood and J. Paulson, ‘Bodies in narratives of doctoral students’ learning and experience’, Stud. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 667–681, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.537320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.537320
L. Wittek, ‘Supervision in Higher Education – A Research Ethics Perspective’, Superv. High. Educ., pp. 123–132, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1108/978-1-83549-093-820251007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-093-820251007
M. S. Knowles, ‘Applying Principles of Adult Learning in Conference Presentations’, Adult Learn., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–14, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.1177/104515959200400105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104515959200400105
A. Y. Kolb and D. A. Kolb, ‘Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Experiential Educators in Higher Education’, Exp. Learn. Teach. High. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 38, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.46787/elthe.v1i1.3362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46787/elthe.v1i1.3362
E. L. Boyer, ‘The Scholarship of Engagement’, Build. Field High. Educ. Engagem., pp. 15–25, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.4324/9781003443353-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443353-2
R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, ‘Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education’, J. High. Educ., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 221–239, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257
D. G. Leitch, ‘Vygotsky, Consciousness, and the German Psycholinguistic Tradition’, Mind Cult. Act., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 305–318, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/10749031003713815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749031003713815
K. Brew and T. N. Garavan, ‘Eliminating inequality: women‐only training, part 1’, J. Eur. Ind. Train., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 13–19, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.1108/03090599510092936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599510092936
J. Mezirow, Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. ERIC, 2000.
A. Hay and Z. Simamane, ‘Preservice teachers’ experiences about a capacity-building activity to foster sustainability competencies through participatory action learning: a systems thinking in practice approach’, Environ. Educ. Res., vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2025.2543508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2025.2543508
S. Nguni, P. Sleegers, and E. Denessen, ‘Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case’, Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 145–177, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1080/09243450600565746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Sulisworo, Ika Maryani, Asyraf Suryadin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







