Misconception Analysis of Student Books on the Theme of Building Household

Muhammad Fuadi; Mohamad Joko Susilo

doi:10.56741/jpes.v2i03.355

Authors

Muhammad Fuadi Universitas Islam Indonesia
Mohamad Joko Susilo
joko.susilo@uii.ac.id
Universitas Islam Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-8533

Keywords:

Families, Households, Misconceptions, Student books

Abstract

This study aimed to discover whether there were misconceptions about Islamic religious education learning materials and manners regarding the theme of the beauty of household mahligai to students. This type of research is a qualitative literature review with a naturalistic approach. In this case, the researcher examines books, journals, theses, and other sources that discuss textbooks on Islamic religious education and morals and the book of Qurrotul Uyun. The data collection technique used in this is a documentary literature review with the object of discussion in question. Data in the library is processed by editing, organising, and finding. Researchers used content analysis in this study. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the misconceptions in the PAI and Characteristics books for grade 12 were related to students, teachers, textbooks, context, and methods. Suppose the categories of misconceptions are sorted from largest to smallest. In that case, they are found in PAI books and manners for class 12, namely oversimplifications, misidentifications, over generalisations, under generalisations and obsolete concepts and terms. None of the textbook’s analytical material is free from misconceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Fuadi, Universitas Islam Indonesia

is a student of Master of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Yogyakarta Islamic University of Indonesia. He is also a person who is happy with the world of education, especially family education in Islam. (email: 21913105@students.uii.ac.id).

Mohamad Joko Susilo, Universitas Islam Indonesia

is a lecturer in Master of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Indonesian Islamic University, Yogyakarta. He is also a book writer, consultant, and motivator. His research interests include the development of educational curricula, educational evaluation, education management, teaching and learning, and the development of learning media. (email: 209131301@uii.ac.id).

References

G. Rahmawati, “Buku teks pelajaran sebagai sumber belajar siswa di perpustakaan sekolah di SMAN 3 Bandung,” EduLib, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 102–113, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v5i1.2307

T. A. Prasetyo, N. Maharta, and Viyanti, “Pengembangan buku siswa dengan pendekatan scientific berbasis multirepresentasi materi impuls dan momentum,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 67–78, 2014.

M. Fuadi, “Nilai-nilai pendidikan keluarga dari tafsir lafadz Basmalah,” Uniiversitas Islam Indonesia, 2021.

P. Suparno, Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika, 2nd ed. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2013.

J. H. Lumbantoruan and H. Male, “Analisis miskonsepsi pada soal cerita teori peluang di program studi pendidikan matematika,” Jurnal EduMatSains, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–168, 2020, doi: 10.33541/edumatsains.v4i2.1380.

M. Dikmenli, O. Çardak, and F. Öztaş, “Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey,” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 429–440, 2009.

L. J. Moleong, Metodologi penelitian kualitatif, 38th ed. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.

S. Suryabrata, Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1983.

D. Hershey, “More misconceptions to avoid when teaching about plant,” American Institute of Biological Sciences, pp. 1–16, 2005.

M. Dikmenli, “A study on analogies used in new ninth grade biology textbook,” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2015.

S. Sakti, A. H. Fatah, and M. E. Anggraeni, “Analisis materi ajar konsep laju reaksi pada buku teks kimia SMA/MA,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 78–91, 2020, doi: 10.37304/jikt.v11i1.77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.77

R. Handoko and H. Sipahutar, “Analisis miskonsepsi pada buku teks biologi SMA kelas x berbasis Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan 2006 dan Kurikulum 2013 Di Kota Tebing Tinggi,” Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2016, doi: 10.24114/jpp.v4i1.3681.

T. A. Mustaqim, Zulfiani, and Y. Herlanti, “Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa dengan menggunakan metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada konsep fotosintesis dan respirasi tumbuhan,” Edusains, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2014, doi: 10.15408/es.v6i2.1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i2.1117