The Contribution of Learning Motivation and Learning Styles to Numeracy Literacy Skills

A Regression-Based Study

https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jpes.001352

Authors

Keywords:

Ex Post Facto Design, Learning Motivation, Learning Styles, Multiple Regression Analysis, Numeracy Literacy Skills

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of learning motivation and learning styles on the numeracy literacy skills of grade 7 at SMP Negeri 2 Kasihan. The research employed a quantitative approach with an ex post facto design. The sample consisted of 120 students selected purposively, and the study was conducted from February to May 2025. The research instruments included a learning motivation questionnaire, a learning style questionnaire, and a numeracy literacy test, all of which underwent construction, expert validation, and pilot testing. Most of the items were found to be valid and reliable, except for several items in the numeracy literacy test that were eliminated. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to obtain the maximum, minimum, total, and mean scores for each variable. The prerequisite tests included normality, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and linearity, all of which indicated that the data met the assumptions for regression analysis. The results of multiple linear regression analysis revealed that learning motivation and learning styles simultaneously had a significant effect on numeracy literacy skills (sig. 0.000 < 0.05). However, partially, neither learning motivation nor learning styles showed a significant effect. The coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.276 indicates that the two independent variables explained 27.6% of the variance in students’ numeracy literacy skills, while the remaining variance was influenced by other factors beyond this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M.M. Endang Susetyawati, PGRI Yogyakarta University

is a lecturer in Mathematics Education at PGRI Yogyakarta University. In addition to his teaching responsibilities, he is actively engaged in a variety of professional training activities. These activities are designed to strengthen his expertise and broaden his perspectives. His main focus of development lies in the fields of educational evaluation and mathematics education. (email: magda@upy.ac.id).

Kristina Warniasih, PGRI Yogyakarta University

is a lecturer in Mathematics Education at PGRI Yogyakarta University. In his role as a lecturer, she is actively involved in teaching and guiding students to develop a strong foundation in mathematics. He also participates in various training activities that are intended to improve his knowledge and teaching skills. His main focus of professional development is in the fields of mathematics and geometry education. (email: kristina@upy.ac.id).

Ika Ernawati, PGRI Yogyakarta University

is a lecturer in Guidance and Counseling at PGRI Yogyakarta University. In addition to his academic responsibilities, he is actively engaged in community service programs. His contributions are particularly focused on providing counseling services that address the needs of the community. Most of his activities emphasize the field of education, where he seeks to support and empower individuals through effective guidance and counseling practices. (email: ika@upy.ac.id).

References

Nurhayati, Jamaris, and Sufyarma Marsidin, “Strengthening Pancasila Student Profiles In Independent Learning Curriculum In Elementary School,” Int. J. Humanit. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 976–988, 2022, doi: 10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.183

D. Ramdani, H. Susilo, Suhadi, and Sueb, “The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Metacognitive Skill Ability: Meta-Analysis on Biological Learning,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1607–1628, 2022, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607

A. H. Dewantara, F. A. Setiawati, and S. Saraswati, “Towards numeracy literacy development: A single-case study on the use of the living book homeschooling model,” Infin. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 225–242, 2023, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p225-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p225-242

OECD, “PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do,” OECD Publ., 2019, doi: 10.1787/5f07c754-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Kemendikbudristek, Pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran. 2022.

A. Ullah et al., “Smart cities: the role of Internet of Things and machine learning in realizing a data-centric smart environment,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1607–1637, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40747-023-01175-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01175-4

Y. Yerizon, A. A. Putra, and M. Subhan, “Student Responses Toward Student Worksheets Based on Discovery Learning for Students with Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Intelligence,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 335, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012113

Siminto, A. R. Afendi, and S. F. A. Widodo, “The Transformation Of Madrasah Through The Use Of Education Technology,” Int. J. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1338–1348, 2024.

L. G. I. Dominguez, A. Robles-Gomez, and R. Pastor-Vargas, “A data-driven approach to engineering instruction: exploring learning styles, study habits, and machine learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, no. January, pp. 10978–11002, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528263

V. F. Reyna and C. J. Brainerd, “Numeracy, gist, literal thinking, and the value of nothing in decision making,” Nat. Rev. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 421–439, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00188-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00188-7

H. Hamzah, M. I. Hamzah, and H. Zulkifli, “Systematic literature review on the elements of metacognition-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14020813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813

O. K. T. Kilag, “Leadership Strategies for Numeracy Development in Educational Settings,” Int. Multi-Disciplinary J. Educ., vol. II, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10552181.

G. Sunzuma, “Technology integration in geometry teaching and learning: A systematic review (2010-2022),” Lumat, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1938

W. O. Pratiwi, S. Sunyono, and ..., “Unveiling the Needs for Ethnoscience-Based E-Worksheets to Enhance Nature of Science and Environmental Awareness of Elementary School Students,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 07, no. March, pp. 118–136, 2024, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v5i1.21099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i1.21099

H. Sikandar, A. Riaz, and C. Author, “The Role of Motivation in Second Language Learning : A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies,” Pakistan Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 322–336, 2025, doi: /10.35484/pssr.2025(9-II)24.

X. Tian and Y. Zhang, “The mediating role of intrinsic motivation in the relationship between external support and performance goals among Chinese high school students: The moderating effect of gender,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 259, no. 15, p. 105375, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105375

A. R. Sayed, M. H. Khafagy, M. Ali, and M. H. Mohamed, “Exploring the VAK model to predict student learning styles based on learning activity,” Intell. Syst. with Appl., vol. 25, no. January, pp. 1–13, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200483

K. Curlewis, B. Leung, M. Perera, P. J. Bazira, and K. A. Sanders, “Clay-Based Modeling in the Anatomist’s Toolkit: A Systematic Review,” Anat. Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 252–262, 2021, doi: 10.1002/ase.1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1996

N. Goyibova, N. Muslimov, G. Sabirova, N. Kadirova, and B. Samatova, “Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs,” MethodsX, vol. 14, no. January, p. 103163, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163

A. G. Saifi, Z. N. Khlaif, and S. Affouneh, “The effect of using community-based learning program in science students’ achievement according to Kolb’s learning styles,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 10, no. October, p. 101125, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101125

J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell, Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

A. D. Rohmawati and A. Fathoni, “Improving Elementary School Student’s Critical Thinking Skills through HOTS-Based Mathematics Questions,” Int. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 631–637, 2022.

Rosnelli and P. A. Ristiana, “Independent Curriculum Learning Management to Improve Students’ Literacy and Numerical Competence in Schools,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 946–963, 2023, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.3513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3513

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

J. Radišić, N. Buchholtz, K. Yang-Hansen, X. Liu, and H. Kaarstein, “Do teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics affect students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics? Examining differences between boys and girls across six countries,” Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1587–1613, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6

Y. Huang, Y. Zhou, J. Chen, and D. Wu, “Applying Machine Learning and SHAP Method to Identify Key Influences on Middle-School Students’ Mathematics Literacy Performance,” J. Intell., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12100093

G. Polydoros and A.-S. Antoniou, “Optimization of Fraction Learning for Students with Learning Difficulties in Mathematics: Computer-Assisted Educational Environments,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127–141, 2025, doi: 10.12973/ijem.11.2.127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.11.2.127

S. Chaiarwut, S. Srikoon, A. Siritaratiwat, and P. Kwangmuang, “Enhancing executive mathematics problem-solving through a constructivist digital learning platform: Design, development and evaluation,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 11, no. January, p. 101338, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101338

S. Oberleiter, J. Fries, L. S. Schock, B. Steininger, and J. Pietschnig, “Predicting cross-national sex differences in large-scale assessments of students’ reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement: Evidence from PIRLS and TIMSS,” Intelligence, vol. 100, no. July, p. 101784, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784

Y. N. Deda, H. Disnawati, and O. Daniel, “How Important of Students’ Literacy and Numeracy Skills in Facing 21st-Century Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review,” Indones. J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 563–572, 2023, doi: 10.23887/ijerr.v6i3.62206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i3.62206

I. Cintamulya, L. Mawartiningsih, and Warli, “Optimizing the Creativity of Reflective and Impulsive Students through Writing Articles Based on Information Literacy,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1657–1665, 2023, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1667

A. Anisah, “Implementation strengthening education character student school al-anwar’s foundations through school culture,” Assyfa J. Islam. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2023, doi: 10.61650/ajis.v1i1.296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v1i1.296

C. Dorris, K. Winter, L. O’Hare, and E. T. Lwoga, “A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review,” Campbell Syst. Rev., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–52, 2024, doi: 10.1002/cl2.1417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1417

D. N. L. Laksana, D. Qondias, L. Veliz, C. Chiu, K. H. D. Utami, and I. G. A. A. P. Listyana, “Adapting Mother Tongue-Based Instructional Models to Address Gender Disparities in Literacy and Numeracy Skills,” Int. J. Lang. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 377–391, 2025, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v1i2.75115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i2.75115

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Susetyawati, M. E., Warniasih, K., & Ernawati, I. (2025). The Contribution of Learning Motivation and Learning Styles to Numeracy Literacy Skills: A Regression-Based Study. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 4(03), 660–673. https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jpes.001352

Plaudit