Determinants of Bribery and Corruption in Public Service Delivery: A Case Study in Nepal

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/jmsd.v2i03.392


Keywords:

Bribe, Corruption, Nepal, Public Service

Abstract

Bribery is a multi-faceted phenomenon prevalent in Nepal's public service delivery. The amount of bribe provided differs by type and nature of services. This paper aims to assess the level of corruption in Nepal. It analyses the additional amount the service receivers supplied to the public officials and their determinants using logistic regression. It uses cross-sectional data collected by the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority in 2017 from 1668 service receivers who received service out of 3400 applicants seeking different public services. It is revealed that the CPI score is 34, which indicates that the level of corruption is high in Nepal. Among the service receivers, 39% provided bribes to public officials and used intermediaries to complete their work, increasing public service costs.  Analysing the determinants of giving fixes shows that gender, education, number of times visiting public offices, perception about the staff behaviour, age and the occupation of the service receiver were significant variables. These findings imply that it is crucial to promote integrity and accountability among public officials by enforcing and monitoring the compliance mechanism and providing different benefits to motivate them to deliver quality services on time. It is equally essential to develop transparent approaches and tools for service delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ganesh Raj Joshi, Samunnat Nepal Guthi (Trust)

is a former Acting Chief Commissioner of the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority and a former bureaucrat with Secretary positions in various Ministries of Nepal. He is the Adjunct Professor at Agriculture and Forestry University, Visiting Professor at Tribhuvan University and a Secretary at Samunnat Nepal Guthi (Prosperous Nepal Trust) of Nepal. He has a PhD in Resource Economics & Policy from UPLB Philippines and a Post-doctoral research from Germany as a Research Fellow of the Humboldt Foundation. He has published over three dozen papers in journal articles, books, book chapters and conference proceedings related to environment and natural resources, agriculture and food security, and governance. (email: grjoshi20@gmail.com).

Dangal, Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority

is a senior bureaucrat with extensive experience in public administration. He is currently the Secretary of the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority in Kathmandu, Nepal. He has a Master of Philosophy in Public Administration from the University of Bergen, Norway. He is an expert in Nepal's public administration, good governance, anti-corruption initiatives and public service management. He has made significant contributions to administration, management, and public policy. His work has earned him recognition and respect within the administrative community. (email: dangalrr@hotmail.com).

References

ACRC (2015). Reducing Bribery for Public Services Delivered to Citizens. Anti Corruption Resource Center. U4 Brief October 2015 No. 11.

Kaufmann, D., Montoriol-Garriga, J. and Recanatini, F. (2008). How Does Bribery Affect Public Service Delivery? Micro-Evidence from Service Users and Public Officials in Peru. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4492

UN (2010). United Nations Global Compact. Principle 10. http://www.un-globalcompact.org/aboutthegc/thetenprinciples/principle10.html

Justesen, M.K. and Bjornskov, C. (2014). Exploiting the Poor: Bureaucratic Corruption and Poverty in Africa. World Development, 58(C), 106-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.002

Hunt, J. and Laszlo, S. (2012). Is Bribery Regressive? Bribery’s Costs, Benefits, and Mechanisms. World Development, 40(2), 355-372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.06.001

Yavas, C. (2007). The Ghost of Corruption. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(38), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1619

Ramdani, D. and Witteloostuijn, van A. (2014). Bribery. Wiley Online Library, 22 January 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517383.wbeccj066

Li, J., Moy, J., Lam, K., and Chris Chu, W. L. (2008). Institutional Pillars and Corruption at the Societal Level. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 327–339. http://doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9622-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9622-y

Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., and Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Deciding to Bribe: A Cross-level Analysis of Firm and Home Country Influences on Bribery Activity. Academic Management Journal,50: 1401–1422. http://doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28179462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28179462

Rose, R. and Peiffer, C. (2012). Paying Bribes to Get Public Services: A Comparative Guide to Concepts and Measures. CSPP Studies in Public Policy No. 494, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2180793

Kumar, G. and Landy, F. (2012). Vertical Governance: Brokerage, Patronage and Corruption in Indian Metropolises, Governing India’s Metropolises, pp. 127-154. Routledge India DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203151860-13

Della Porta, D. and Vannucci, A. (2012). Political corruption. In E. Amenta, K. Nash & A. Scott (Eds.). The Wiley‐Blackwell companion to political sociology. https://doi:10.1002/9781444355093.ch12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444355093.ch12

Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1991). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

Wrigley, N. (1985). Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists, Longman, New York, USA.

Panta, K.P.(2016). Decentralization of Corruption and Local Public Service Delivery in Nepal. NRB Economic Review, 28 (2): 43-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/nrber.v28i2.52533

Ghimire, D. K. (2018). The state of corruption and anticorruption in Nepal at a glimpse. Contemporary Social Sciences, 27(4), 72-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29070/27/58310

Subedi, M.S. (2005). Corruption in Nepal: An Anthropological Inquiry. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 1, 110-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v1i0.283

Ghimire, D.K.(2022). Corruption and Underdevelopment in Nepal: A Content Analysis. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 16,98-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v16i01.50979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v16i01.50979

Cowell, R., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Chen, A. (2012). Public Confidence and Public Services: It Matters What You Measure. Policy & Politics, 40(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1332/147084411x581862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/147084411X581862

NASC (2018). Nepal National Governance Survey (NNGS) 2017/18. Nepal Administrative Staff College.

Gupta, A. K., Bhurtel, A., and Bhattarai, P. C. (2023). Service Users’ Confidence in Accessing Public Services in Nepal: What Makes Differences? Journal of Policy Studies, 38(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps38103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52372/jps38103

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Joshi, G. R., & Dangal, R. (2023). Determinants of Bribery and Corruption in Public Service Delivery: A Case Study in Nepal. Journal of Management Studies and Development, 2(03), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.56741/jmsd.v2i03.392

Plaudit