Will ChatGPT bring a New Paradigm to HR World? A Critical Opinion Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/jmsd.v2i02.316
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, Human Resources (HR), Job Seekers
Abstract
Since ChatGPT was first publicly available in November 2022, it has sparked attention worldwide. Some believe that ChatGPT might revolutionize our lives. There have been interesting discussions surrounding ChatGPT. In this chance, we explore the potential use of ChatGPT in the HR industry. For HR managers, the use of AI in HR has traditionally been limited to simple tasks, but ChatGPT's ability to understand and respond to natural language input opens up new possibilities for automating more complex HR tasks such as interviewing and onboarding. On the other side, ChatGPT can also help job seekers to get their dream jobs. To begin with, ChatGPT can be employed to find out the benefits and working environment in a specific company, although it should be noted that ChatGPT's answers cannot be blindly trusted. ChatGPT can also prepare a cover letter, a motivation letter, an application email, etc. Job seekers can even ask ChatGPT to act as an interviewer in an interview mockup. We present ChatGPT utilization examples in the HR world. In this article, we also conducted a mini experiment to investigate whether, in its current state, ChatGPT can generate a convincing cover letter that is able to fool HR specialists. The results showed that among the 5 study participants, none of them were able to correctly guess all of the letters, with the average correct answers of only 2 of 4 cover letters. Lastly, we also discuss the potential benefits and challenges of using ChatGPT in the HR industry in this article. Nevertheless, we argue that ChatGPT introduces a HR world’s paradigm shift.
Downloads
References
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health.
Karaali, G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Basic Skills, and Quantitative Literacy. Numeracy, 16(1), 9.
Aydın, Ö., & Karaarslan, E. (2022). OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: Digital twin in healthcare. Available at SSRN 4308687.
Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchan, E. C. (2023). ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04655.
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., ... & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198.
Hisan, U. K., & Amri, M. M. (2023). ChatGPT and medical education: A double-edged sword. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 2(01), 71-89.
Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 103662.
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09292.
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT.
Castelvecchi, D. (2022). Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers?. Nature.
Transformer, G. G. P., Thunström, A. O., & Steingrimsson, S. (2022). Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input?.
Transformer, C. G. P. T., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2022). Rapamycin in the context of Pascal's Wager: generative pre-trained transformer perspective. Oncoscience, 9, 82.
O'Connor, S. (2022). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?. Nurse Education in Practice, 66, 103537-103537.
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313.
Unleash.ai. (2023). Everything HR needs to know about ChatGPT. Available at: https://www.unleash.ai/emerging-tech/everything-hr-needs-to-know-about-chatgpt/. Accessed: 28 Jan 2023.
de Winter, J. C. F. (2023). Can ChatGPT Pass High School Exams on English Language Comprehension?.
Tech News. (2023). ChatGPT fools HR professionals: AI writes motivation letter and test assignment better than 80% of applicants. Available at: https://tech.news.am/eng/news/636/chatgpt-fools-hr-professionals-ai-writes-motivation-letter-and-test-assignment-better-than-80-of-applicants.html. Accessed: 28 Jan 2023.
Hisan, U. K., & Amri, M. M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Human Life: A Critical Opinion from Medical Bioethics Perspective–Part I. Journal of Public Health Sciences, 1(02), 100-111.
BBC News. (2015). Google apologises for Photos app's racist blunder. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-33347866. Accessed: 29 Jan 2023.
Lyons, K. (2020). Twitter is looking into why its photo preview appears to favor white faces over Black faces. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/20/21447998/twitter-photo-preview-white-black-faces. Accessed: 29 Jan 2023.
BBC News. (2020). IBM abandons "biased" facial recognition tech. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52978191. Accessed: 30 Jan 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ifta Firdausa Nuzula, Muhammad Miftahul Amri
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.