Ethical Perceptions of Generation Z on Duped Products
The Role of Intellectual Property Awareness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jmsd.001936
Keywords:
Business Ethics, Duped Products, Ethical Perceptions, Generation Z, Intellectual Property
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of dupe products has raised ethical concerns, particularly among Generation Z, whose consumption behavior is shaped by affordability, social influence, and evolving moral standards. While prior studies have examined ethical consumption and intellectual property (IP) awareness separately, limited research explains how consumer-related factors translate into ethical perceptions through IP awareness. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the ethical perceptions of Generation Z toward duped products by examining the relationships among consumer-related influencing factors, IP awareness, and ethical perceptions within a mediated framework. Employing a quantitative, descriptive–correlational design, data were collected from 400 Generation Z respondents in Metro Manila using a validated, researcher-made questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, non-parametric correlation, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The findings reveal that consumer-related influencing factors significantly affect ethical perceptions both directly and indirectly through IP awareness, confirming a partial mediation effect. Although Generation Z demonstrates general awareness of IP rights and acknowledges ethical concerns, economic practicality and social normalization continue to shape ethical judgments. Anchored on Behavioral Reasoning Theory and Cognitive Dissonance Theory, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of ethically ambiguous consumption by highlighting how awareness interacts with consumer reasoning processes. The findings have implications for IP education, ethical marketing, and policy initiatives aimed at promoting responsible consumption. The study concludes that strengthening IP awareness alone is insufficient; ethical interventions must also address the economic and social contexts influencing Generation Z. Future research is recommended to explore longitudinal effects and cross-cultural perspectives on ethical consumption of dupe products.
Downloads
References
Y. Purwati and A. Widodo, “The customer journey in purchasing counterfeit fashion among Generation Z,” Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 254–266, 2025, doi: 10.29407/nusamba.v10i1.22511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v10i1.22511
R. A. Bulante, J. M. Catalan, N. G. L. Miranda, D. T. Torres and J. S. Sabaulan, “The consumer behavior of Generation Z: An impact in modern marketing innovations,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 950–979, 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG0074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG0074
S. Chandra and P. Gupta, “Dupe culture and digital deception: Legal challenges of trade mark dilution in influencer-driven comparative advertising,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.54448
Q. ZhiYu, “Exploring the influence of consumer perception, social norms, and face consciousness on Generation Z’s willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury goods,” Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.56982/dream.v3i08.262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i08.262
E. Djafarova and S. Foots, “Exploring ethical consumption of Generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour,” Young Consumers, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 413–431, 2022, doi: 10.1108/YC-10-2021-1405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2021-1405
A. Halibas, U. Akram, A.-P. Hoang and M. D. T. Hoang, “Unveiling the future of responsible, sustainable, and ethical consumption: A bibliometric study on Gen Z and young consumers,” Young Consumers, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 142–171, 2025, doi: 10.1108/YC-11-2024-2327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2024-2327
W. Wojdyla and T. Chi, “Decoding the fashion quotient: An empirical study of key factors influencing U.S. Generation Z’s purchase intention toward fast fashion,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, Art. no. 5116, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16125116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125116
Q. ZhiYu, “A study on the influence of consumer perception, norm and face consciousness on the willingness to purchase counterfeit luxury goods: A case of Generation Z,” Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.56982/dream.v3i04.223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56982/dream.v3i04.223
A. Raj and D. Panwar, “A study on the effectiveness of influencer marketing on Gen Z purchase decisions,” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 5725–5732, 2025, doi: 10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1768
P. E. Chaudhry, “Dupe influencers exploiting social media to peddle luxury fakes,” Business Horizons, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 719–727, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.005
A. Mishra and A. Siby, “The impact of replicas and first-copy products on authentic products: An exploration in the apparel industry,” International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management, vol. 2, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0142
R. A. Nursafira, V. Nathania, R. Handoko and A. Budiman, “Why do people buy dupe cosmetics?” Kajian Branding Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 2024, doi: 10.21632/kbi.6.1.71-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21632/kbi.6.1.71-85
M. Toukabri and A. Shili, “Consumer trust, confidence, and price sensitivity: Drivers of engaged consumption in ethical markets,” International Journal of Religion, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 207–219, 2025, doi: 10.61707/8gesdk12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/8gesdk12
S. L. T. Mouritzen, V. Penttinen and S. Pedersen, “Virtual influencer marketing: The good, the bad and the unreal,” European Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 410–440, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2022-0915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2022-0915
I. U. Hewapathirana and N. Perera, “Navigating the age of AI influence: A systematic literature review of trust, engagement, efficacy and ethical concerns of virtual influencers in social media,” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, vol. 8, no. 8, Art. no. 6352, 2024, doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6352
B. Lei, Y. Chang, W. Liu and S. Shi, “IP, limited release and premium consumption: Evidence from Generation Z,” Kybernetes, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 5676–5699, 2024, doi: 10.1108/K-11-2023-2385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2023-2385
N. Malllick, “Intellectual property rights in the digital age: Issues and solutions,” International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1089–1095, 2025, doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/20997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/20997
A. Moudgil, “Evaluation of awareness about intellectual property rights,” Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 109–117, 2025, doi: 10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n3.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n3.013
R. Sheokand, “Safeguarding innovation in the digital age: The role of intellectual property rights in the emerging digital economy,” International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, vol. 16, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.36676/irps.v16.i2.273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v16.i2.273
J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks and S. Ray, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R, Springer, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
M. Mazli, “The impact of consumer ethics on intention to purchase counterfeit fashion products,” Information Management and Business Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 761–769, 2024, doi: 10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.4165
M. Hariharan and S. Saikrishnan, “A study on consumer perception and level of satisfaction on counterfeit products: Special reference to lifestyle products,” International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management, vol. 4, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.55041/isjem02676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55041/ISJEM02676
F. F. Balahadia, R. R. Fiscal, J. N. Olayta, M. C. Pablo, M. R. Valmote and J. A. C. Ganibo, “University students’ awareness on intellectual property rights,” International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, vol. 3, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.53378/352910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53378/352910
S. Kim and J. E. Ha-Brookshire, “The role of intellectual property right morality and affordability in consumers’ legally copied product purchase decision-making,” International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 80, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.31274/itaa.17452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.17452
P. Vimalnath, F. Tietze, E. Eppinger, A. Jain, A. Gurtoo and M. Elsen, “Responsible intellectual property strategy for sustainability transition: An exploratory study,” World Patent Information, vol. 73, Art. no. 102195, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102195
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rolando Magat Jr, Arahvela Dungog, Laurence A. Castillo, Alyssa Kyla V. Cimacio, Ronafel C. De Los Reyes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








