Communication Skills of Gynaecological Medical Staff Concerning the Patient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/hesmed.v2i03.358
Keywords:
effective communication, gynecology, medical personnel, patient
Abstract
Effective communication of medical staff in gynaecology and obstetrics, in relation between the doctor and the patient, is essential and of particular importance. Communication helps patients to have trust in the healthcare services provided by the medical staff and can impact the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. Medical personnel should be careful and sensitive to the patient's needs, understand their problems, and have good communication and information-sharing skills. An informed patient is more likely to understand the diagnosis and treatment, which can enhance cooperation with the doctor. Quick and successful contact by medical personnel can help reduce patient anxiety and stress, affecting the achievement of treatment goals. In gynaecology and obstetrics, effective communication between the doctor, resulting in effective treatment and care, is crucial for the mother and her fetus. The communication between the doctor and the pregnant woman has a close emotional connection, considering the specific condition of pregnant women.
Downloads
References
Başol, E. (2018). Hasta İle Sağlik Çalişanlari (Doktor Ve Hemşire). International Anatolia Academic Online Journal, 76-93.
Demir, A. (2019, April). İletişimin Hasta Memnuniyetine Etkisi.
Du, L., Xu, J., Chen, X., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, R., ... & Zhou, L. (2020). Rebuild doctor–patient trust in medical service delivery in China. Scientific reports, 10(1), 21956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78921-y
Varinli, İ. (2004). Hizmet Kalitesi, Değer, Hasta Tatmini Ve Davranişsal Niyetler Arasindaki İlişki-Kayseri'de Poliklinik Hastalarina Yönelik Bir Araştirma. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(17), 33-52.
Ratna Sari, D. (2021). Impact of Effective Communication on the Quality of Excellent Service and Patient Satisfaction in the Outpatient Department. KnE Life Sciences, 232-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v0i0.8883
Norouzinia, R. A. (2015). Communication Barriers Perceived by Nurses and Patients. Global journal of health science, 8(6), 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p65
Popa-Velea, O. &. (2014). Issues of therapeutic communication relevant to improving quality of care. Journal of Medicine and Life, 7 Spec No.4 (Spec ISS4), 39-45.
Kim, S. S., Kaplowitz, S., & Johnston, M. V. (2014). The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(3), 237-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037
Neumann, M., Wirtz, M., Bollschweiler, E., Mercer, S. W., Warm, M., & Wolf, J. (2007). Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Education and Counseling, 69(1-3), 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003
Hagiwara, N., Slatcher, R. B., Eggly, S., & Penner, L. A. (2013). Physician–patient communication and patient anxiety among women with abnormal mammograms. Medical Care, 51(12), 1065-1072.
Street Jr, R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Ananeh-Firempong, O. (2003). Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care. Public Health Reports, 118(4), 293-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50253-4
Epstein, R. M., Franks, P., Fiscella, K., Shields, C. G., Meldrum, S. C., Kravitz, R. L., ... & Duberstein, P. R. (2015). Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), 1516-1528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD000072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
Safer, J., Tang, T., & Cook, R. (2015). The importance of standardized communication in obstetrics. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58(2), 427-433.
Lau, J., Knudsen, J. L., Jackson, D. J., Farrow, V. A., & O'Connell, C. M. (2020). Use of digital health technologies in obstetrics and gynecology: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135(4), 869-881.
Stuebe, A. (2017). Should you Google your symptoms? JAMA, 318(6), 511-512.Dartiguelongue JB, C. P. (2021). Communication in health care teams. Arch Argent Pediatr., 119(6): e589-e593.
Meterko, M., Mohr, D. C., Young, G. J., & Stolzmann, K. L. (2020). Teamwork culture and patient satisfaction in hospitals. Medical Care, 58(6), 547-554.
Hannawa, A. F., Wu, A. W., Kolyada, A., Potemkina, A., & Donaldson, L. J. (2022, June). The aspects of healthcare quality that are important to health professionals and patients: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling, 105, 1561-1570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.016
Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2014). Factors influencing healthcare service quality. International Journal of healthy policy and management, 3(2), 77-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2014.65
Birkhäuer, J., Gaab, J., Kossowsky, J., Hasler, S., & Krummenacher, P. (2017). Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PloS One, 12(2), e0170988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170988
Siamatu, M. (2020). An Analysis of The Effectiveness of The Communication Channels Used between Health Personnels And Patients. Retrieved from Cavendish Repository: http://192.168.1.248:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/614
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hajrullah Latifi, Drilon Latifi
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.