Integrating Scientific and Popular Article Literacy into the School Operational Curriculum: A case study at Shafta High School Surabaya

Nuphanudin; Dinda Hanum Salsabila; Suci Cahya Margaretah; M. Tegar Indra Saputra

doi:10.56741/IISTR.bei.001836

Authors

Nuphanudin
nuphanudinnuphanudin@unesa.ac.id
Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-063X
Dinda Hanum Salsabila Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2844-7061
Suci Cahya Margaretah Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5568-4262
M. Tegar Indra Saputra Universitas Negeri Surabaya https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6366-4429

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.bei.001836

Keywords:

Curriculum Management, Popular Article, Popular Literacy, Scientific Article, Scientific Literacy, Secondary Education

Abstract

This study examines how scientific and popular article literacy is integrated into the operational curriculum of Shafta High School Surabaya. The study was conducted in response to the need to strengthen students’ academic literacy, scientific reasoning, and ability to communicate academic ideas in accessible language. A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The participants were selected purposively and consisted of school leaders, curriculum managers, Indonesian language and civics teachers, and students in grades XI and XII who had participated in scientific writing activities. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis through transcription, coding, categorization, theme development, and interpretation. The findings show that scientific writing has been included in the school’s operational curriculum, particularly in Indonesian language and civics subjects. However, its integration remains implicit, fragmented, and dependent on individual teacher initiatives. Popular article writing has not yet been systematically connected with scientific writing, causing students to experience difficulties in adapting scientific ideas into simple, communicative, and public-oriented language. This study concludes that integrating scientific and popular article literacy requires clearer curriculum planning, teacher training, project-based learning, structured writing modules, and assessment rubrics that measure both scientific reasoning and communicative clarity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nuphanudin, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

serves as a lecturer in the Educational Management Study Program at Universitas Negeri Surabaya. His academic role supports the development of research, scientific writing, and educational management studies, particularly in strengthening students’ ability to produce scholarly work. In this article, his contribution is reflected in guiding the conceptual direction, ensuring the coherence of arguments, and supporting the academic quality of the manuscript. His experience in academic publication and educational management provides an important foundation for maintaining the relevance and rigor of the study. (email: nuphanudinnuphanudin@unesa.ac.id).

Dinda Hanum Salsabila, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

is an undergraduate student in the Educational Management Study Program at Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. Her academic interest in educational management encourages her to contribute to the development of scholarly writing, particularly in strengthening the quality of references and improving parts of the manuscript that require further refinement. In this article, she contributes by searching for relevant literature, supporting the development of arguments, and assisting in the revision of the manuscript. Her previous organizational experience as a member of the student council strengthened her ability to collaborate, communicate effectively, and carry out responsibilities with commitment. These academic and organizational experiences have shaped her confidence and motivation to participate actively in research, literacy development, and leadership-oriented academic activities. (email: 25010714259@mhs.unesa.ac.id).

Suci Cahya Margaretah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

is a Management student in the Education Program at Universitas Negeri Surabaya. She is known as an active and highly committed individual, as reflected in her involvement as an active member of IPPNU Jombang. In the field of literacy, Suci began writing a book on the Wattpad platform when she was still in junior high school, marking the beginning of her interest in writing. Within organizational activities, she often takes on strategic roles due to her strong communication and coordination skills. She possesses various abilities, including cooking, painting, singing, and public speaking, all of which contribute to her growing confidence. Suci also has a deep interest in art and creativity, which she often expresses through her works and performances. Outside of academic and organizational activities, she enjoys exercising to maintain her health and fitness. In addition, she loves traveling as a way to explore new environments and broaden her horizons.

M. Tegar Indra Saputra, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

is an undergraduate student in the Educational Management Study Program at Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. His academic interest focuses on educational management and policy, particularly on how effective management can support the quality and improvement of educational institutions. As a first-semester student, he is actively developing his knowledge through lectures, academic activities, and collaborative learning experiences. In this article, he contributes by supporting the development of ideas, assisting in manuscript preparation, and strengthening the discussion from the perspective of educational management. His commitment to continuous learning reflects his motivation to grow professionally and contribute positively to the advancement of Indonesian education. (email: 25010714055@mhs.unesa.ac.id).

References

OECD, “PISA 2025 science framework,” Paris, France, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/. [Accessed: Aug. 27, 2026].

I. V. S. Mullis and M. O. Martin, Eds., PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA, USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://pirls2021.org/frameworks/. [Accessed: Aug. 27, 2026].

J. M. Swales, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

K. Hyland, Second Language Writing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

S. P. Norris and L. M. Phillips, “How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy,” Sci. Educ., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 224–240, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1002/sce.10066.

J. L. Lemke, Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ, USA: Ablex Publishing, 1990.

S. Graham and D. Perin, Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools—A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC, USA: Alliance for Excellent Education, 2007.

S. Graham and M. Hebert, Writing to Read: Evidence for How Writing Can Improve Reading—A Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC, USA: Alliance for Excellent Education, 2010.

T. Shanahan and C. Shanahan, “Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy,” Harvard Educ. Rev., vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 40–59, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101.

E. B. Moje, “Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change,” J. Adolesc. Adult Lit., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 96–107, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1.

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Operasional di Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/26058/. [Accessed: Aug. 27, 2026].

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015.

G. A. Bowen, “Document analysis as a qualitative research method,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, 2009, doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 1985.

M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2016.

J. S. Krajcik and P. C. Blumenfeld, “Project-based learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, R. K. Sawyer, Ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 317–334, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816833.020.

S. Bell, “Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future,” Clearing House: J. Educ. Strategies Issues Ideas, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 39–43, 2010, doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415.

P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Assessment and classroom learning,” Assessment Educ.: Princ., Policy Pract., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–74, 1998, doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102.

J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.

R. W. Tyler, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1949.

H. Taba, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962.

G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design, expanded 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.