Before you submit your manuscript, it is highly recommended that you re-evaluate it using the Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL), an instrument that is developed to help you get the effective time of the peer-reviewing process.
Pre-Evaluation Criteria |
|
Strong |
Fair |
Poor |
Title: Straightforward, informative, and represents the contents of the article. |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
Abstract: Concise but at least contain the problem, purpose, method, important findings, and implications of the research. |
|
10 |
5 |
2 |
Keywords: Searchable by the search engine, truly represents the intention of research. Don’t use phrases, only words. 5 to 6 keyword is recommended. |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
Introduction: Directing the reader about the importance of the research. Presenting significant problems, a clear state of the art, gap analysis, and novel concepts to fill the gaps. End it with the purpose of research. |
|
15 |
10 |
5 |
Method: Clear and replicable. Reveals how research objectives are achieved with the appropriate tools, procedures, and stages. |
|
10 |
5 |
2 |
Results: Presenting experimental or survey data, or any other kind of data depending on the type of research. The results are generally presented in clear and readable tables and figures. |
|
15 |
10 |
5 |
Discussion: Meaningful. A Good discussion is written as a dialogue that reveals the progress of the research in comparison to previous research. |
|
20 |
15 |
5 |
Conclusion: Contains a summary of research results (the most important research finding) that relates to the objectives written in the introduction. |
|
10 |
4 |
1 |
References: Accountable, about 80% of the literature are from primary sources (reputable journals) and up to date (last 10 years). Use reference management tools (e.g., Mendeley, Zotero, etc.). |
|
10 |
5 |
1 |
Total Score |
|
100 |
60 |
25 |
Decision Matrix
Score |
Probability |
85-100 |
Most likely to be published with little discussion with Editor/Reviewer(s) |
70-84 |
Possible minor revision (if there are no significant mistakes in the main contents) |
50-69 |
Possible major revision |
25-49 |
Most likely to be rejected in the first stage |