Figure Out the Online Discussion Activeness of Pre-Teacher Education Students
Keywords:
Elementary Education, Pre-teacher Training, Online Discussion, Online LearningAbstract
Online learning has been widely applied at various levels of education, including lectures for prospective teachers of elementary school students in Indonesia. However, student activity in learning is still an obstacle in this study. This study describes student activity in online discussions. The discussion was conducted three times with different topics. The activity can be examined from the students' posts during the three discussions. The three aspects of the activeness were the number of posts in each discussion, participation in the three discussion topics, and the number of words in each post. These results were analyzed descriptively to see the trend of active discussion. The findings of this study show the role of lecturers in providing appreciation and feedback. The role of friends in reinforcing other friends' opinions determines the increase in activity in discussions. Social presence, self-esteem engagement, and social learning are essential issues in increasing this activity.
Downloads
References
Fisher, M., & Baird, D. E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support, self‐regulation, and retention. Campus-wide information systems.
Dwikurnaningsih, Y., & Waruwu, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Based Learning in Universities During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 670-677.
Ammenwerth, E., Hackl, W. O., Hoerbst, A., & Felderer, M. (2021). Indicators for cooperative, online-based learning and their role in quality management of online learning. In Research Anthology on Developing Effective Online Learning Courses (pp. 1709-1724). IGI Global.
Satrianawati, S., & Fu, W. H. (2019). Education for sustainable development (ESD) in Indonesia: A Conceptual framework. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 42-49.
Cora, H. (2019). The effects of characteristics of generation Z on 21st century business strategies. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), 909-926.
Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109.
Nisarohmah, L., & Chodijah, M. (2021, April). The Effectiveness of Online Learning in Increasing Student Productivity. In Gunung Djati Conference Series (Vol. 4, pp. 762-769).
Satrianawati, S. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Untuk Keterampilan Abad ke-21 [Learning Model for the 21st-century skills]. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Bellanca, J. A. (Ed.). (2010). 21st-century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution tree press.
Stacey, E., & Rice, M. (2002). Evaluating an online learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 323-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1763.
Lee, S. J., & Huang, K. (2018). Online interactions and social presence in online learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(1), 113-128.
Lim, J. R. N., Rosenthal, S., Sim, Y. J. M., Lim, Z. Y., & Oh, K. R. (2021). Making online learning more satisfying: The effects of online-learning self-efficacy, social presence, and content structure. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 1-14.
Gao, X. (2021). Engaging students affectively to stimulate social presence in online learning. Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich, 14(2). doi: 10.21100/compass.v14i2.1205
Chen, B., Chang, Y. H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21-30
Dilling, J., Varga, M. A., & Mandernach, B. J. (2020). Comparing teaching and social presence in traditional and online community college learning environments. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(10-12), 854-869.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281-298.
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163.
Wang, Q. (2009). Designing a web-based constructivist learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 1-13.
Maor, D. (2003). Teacher's and students' perspectives on online learning in a social constructivist learning environment. Technology, pedagogy and education, 12(2), 201-218.
Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of “Web 2.0” technology. In International Forum of Teaching and Studies (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 39-50).
Ferguson, R., & Shum, S. B. (2012, April). Social learning analytics: five approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 23-33).
Ladd, G. W. (1981). Effectiveness of a social learning method for enhancing children's social interaction and peer acceptance. Child development, 171-178.
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., ... & Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning?. Ecology and society, 15(4).
Ferguson, R., & Shum, S. B. (2012, April). Social learning analytics: five approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 23-33).
Bolzan, P., Ascani, A., Minighin, D., & Ventrella, M. (2020). Peer-To-Peer Learning as A Generator of New Proactive Practices for Students Engagement. In EDULEARN20 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 5361-5368). IATED Academy.
Murray, Z., Roiko, A., Sebar, B., & Rogers, G. D. (2020). Fostering peer learning and self-reflection: A two-pronged strategy to augment the effectiveness of Work Integrated Learning placements. In Enriching Higher Education Students' Learning through Post-work Placement Interventions (pp. 209-228). Springer, Cham.
Zhao, Y., Zheng, Z., Pan, C., & Zhou, L. (2021). Self-Esteem and Academic Engagement Among Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690828.
Morton, M. H., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Youth empowerment programs for improving adolescents’ self-efficacy and self-esteem: A systematic review. Research on social work practice, 23(1), 22-33.
Rashwan, Z. I., Busebaia, T. J., Al-Sabbagh, A. S., & Eweida, R. S. (2021). Effect of guided reciprocal peer questioning strategy on pediatric nursing students' self-esteem and metacognitive awareness: Current approach and future directions. Nurse Education Today, 107, 105153.
Sadeghi, E., & Ganji, M. (2020). The effects of cooperative learning on Iranian university students’ class-engagement, self-esteem, and self-confidence. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(4), 89-109.
Minev, M., Petrova, B., Mineva, K., Petkova, M., & Strebkova, R. (2018). Self-esteem in adolescents. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 16(2), 114-118.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Fitri Indriani, Dwi Sulisworo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









