Revolutionizing Listening Practice: Integrating Autoproctor Google Forms for Scalable English Learning in Large EFL Classrooms
Keywords:
Auto Proctor, Digital Assessment, EFL, Google Forms, Listening ComprehensionAbstract
This study explores the integration of AutoProctor-enabled Google Forms to enhance English listening comprehension in large EFL classrooms. The research aims to address challenges of academic integrity and scalability faced by university instructors in technology-limited contexts. Employing a descriptive mixed-method design, data were collected from 95 undergraduate students and one lecturer through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The results indicate that the integration of AutoProctor in listening activities improved students’ motivation, confidence, and comprehension, while also ensuring a fair testing environment through automated proctoring features. Participants appreciated the platform’s automated grading, immediacy of feedback, and accessibility for independent practice. However, technical limitations such as unstable connectivity and restricted access to premium features occasionally constrained learning efficiency. The study highlights that AutoProctor-based Google Forms constitute a viable and integrity-oriented innovation for large-scale English learning, supporting both learner autonomy and sustainable digital pedagogy. The findings also offer implications for the broader use of AI-assisted assessment in EFL instruction.
Downloads
References
S. Graham and D. Santos, Strategies for Second Language Listening: Current Scenarios and Improved Pedagogy. U.S.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. doi: 10.1057/9781137410528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410528
M. Rost, Teaching and Researching Listening, Second Edition. Harlow: Pearson, 2011. [Online]. Available: www.pearson-books.com
A. Purnomo, Q. Faviandhani, A. Ariwibowo, B. Purwoko, and N. Hariyati, “The effect of using Google Forms to improve English listening skills,” Santhet: J. Sej. Pendidik. Hum., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2263-2267, 2024, doi: 10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4640
D. Kurniawati and S. Lestari, “Using Google Forms for online listening test: Does it work?,” Eng. Edu: J. Tadris Bhs. Inggris, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 136–155, 2020, doi: 10.24042/ee-jtbi.v13i2.7077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v13i2.7077
S. Rabbasa, H. Hamamah, and M. Isnaini, “The use of Google Form as a formative assessment tool in EFL classes: An exploratory case study,” in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Entitled Lang. Lit. Cult. Stud., ICON LATERALS 2023, 11-12 July 2023, Malang, Indonesia, EAI, 2023. doi: 10.4108/eai.11-7-2023.2340618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-7-2023.2340618
R. E. Prasetya and F. Sofiani, “Assessing the effectiveness of Google Forms and Microsoft Forms in English language evaluation,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Ling. (IJEAL), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 422–438, 2025, doi: 10.47709/ijeal.v4i3.5125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v4i3.5125
N. D. Handayani and A. Ambalegin, “Google Form application effect on students’ basic English grammar mastery,” ELP – J. Eng. Lang. Ped., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 88–105, 2023, doi: 10.36665/elp.v8i1.735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v8i1.735
H. Wibowo and A. A. Rahmah, “The use of Google Form as a learning evaluation tool in English lessons during pandemic Covid-19,” Akademika, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 437–445, 2021, doi: 10.34005/akademika.v10i02.1594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v10i02.1594
Yuliana, L. Ramdhani, and A. Rahmawan, “The effectiveness of using Google Form examination questions in Ict Subjects class VIII,” J. Ilm. Mandala Educ. (JIME), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2656–5862, 2024, doi: 10.58258/jime.v9i1.7584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v10i4.7584
A. A. Manggaberani and A. M. Darlis, “The effectiveness of Google Forms in assessing and evaluating online learning outcomes: Meta-analysis study,” Indones. J. Soc. Technol., vol. 5, no. 10, p. 4561, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/037e/4146ce98522416c1c483e2d6b097c4bbda86.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i10.5305
A. B. P. Sari, D. Iswahyuni, S. Rejeki, and S. Sutanto, “Google Forms as an EFL assessment tool: Positive features and limitations,” Premise: J. Eng. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 231-250, 2020, doi: 10.24127/pj.v9i2.3037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v9i2.3037
J. Zhao and C. I. Lee, “Teaching EFLLs listening subskills with a speaking-listening model in a computer-mediated communication setting,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, e836013, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836013
N. Ima and A. Jihad, “Computer-assisted language learning: The impact in language education,” Vifada J. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2024, doi: 10.70184/smkf7m80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70184/smkf7m80
D. Hayes, “Helping teachers to cope with large classes,” ELT J., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 106–116, 1997, doi: 10.1093/elt/51.2.106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.2.106
S. Han, S. Nikou, and W. Yilma Ayele, “Digital proctoring in higher education: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Educ. Mgmt., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 265–285, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-12-2022-0522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2022-0522
D. Susyla and S. Jaya, “Digital assessment in English Language Teaching (ELT): A systematic literature review,” Edu-Ling, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 135–156, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.unihaz.ac.id/index.php/edu-ling/id/article/view/4246.
A. Bahari, F. Han, and A. Strzelecki, “Integrating CALL and AIALL for an interactive pedagogical model of language learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr)., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 14305–14333, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13388-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13388-w
M. Alguacil, N. Herranz-Zarzoso, J. C. Pernías, and G. Sabater-Grande, “Academic dishonesty and monitoring in online exams: A randomized field experiment,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 835–851, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12528-023-09378-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09378-x
T. N. Fitria, “Using Google Forms as an online learning assessment tool for Non-EFL students,” J. Eng. Lang. Teach. Ling. Lit. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 64–80, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/jeltis/article/viewFile/2641/1590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/jeltis.v3i2.2641
G. Unser-Schutz, “Increasing feedback for students with personalized reports and Google Forms,” in P. Clements, A. Krause, and H. Brown (Eds.) Japan Assoc. Lang. Teach. – Transformation Lang. Educ., Tokyo: JALT, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jalt2016-pcp-054.pdf.
R. Hildayati and M. Melani, “An investigating students’ experiences of autonomous learning in an English online platform,” The Progress: J. Lang. Ethnicity, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.iainkerinci.ac.id/index.php/progress/article/view/1953.
C. Suryanovika, “Google Forms: An assessment tool accommodating the Generation-Z students’ learning needs,” E-Structural, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 140–152, 2020, doi: 10.33633/es.v2i2.3257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v2i2.3257
A. Sakhipov, I. Omirzak, and A. Fedenko, “Beyond face recognition: A multi-layered approach to academic integrity in online exams,” Electr. J. e-Learn., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2025, doi: 10.34190/ejel.23.1.3896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.1.3896
Y. Zhan, “Beyond technology: Factors influencing the effects of teachers’ audio feedback on students’ project-based learning,” Technol. Ped. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2022.2093965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2093965
J. Oranga, A. Matere, and E. Njurai, “The mixed methods research approach: An overview,” Postmodernism Problems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2025, doi: 10.46324/pmp2501084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46324/PMP2501084
G. Derrick, D. Sumbiri, J. Ngugi, and P. Habimana, “Design and Implementation of an e-exam cheating control system using real-time monitoring and behavioral detection,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 3080–9576, 2025, doi: 10.70619/vol5iss9pp12-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70619/vol5iss9pp12-27
K. L. Narayana, G. Dinesh, K. K. Kumar, P. P. Adithya, M. H. V. S. Sai, and V. C. M. Reddy, “Online Exam Proctoring,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., pp. 1568–1582, 2025, doi: 10.38124/ijisrt/25apr798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr798
N. E. Zahara and Yuliati, “Using Edpuzzle interactive video to enhance listening skills article info,” J. Eng. Lang. Teach., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 334–344, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/elt/article/view/29160.
R. Firmansyah, “The role of educational technology in enhancing student motivation in the digital era,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Holist. (JIPH), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 2025, doi: 10.55927/jiph.v4i1.13012.
N. Sari, “The role of technology in facilitating EFL learning: A case study approach,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4159–4167, 2024, doi: 10.37985/jer.v5i3.1601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1601
N. A. E. Nia and R. Fithriani, “Lecturers’ challenges and strategies in teaching English writing skills in large classes,” J. Pnl. Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidik.: e-Saintika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 129–143, 2023, doi: 10.36312/esaintika.v7i1.1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v7i1.1138
G. Al Najar and M. N. Ahmad, “A review on factors affecting the success of online proctoring system,” J. Inf. Syst. Res. Pract., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ijps.um.edu.my/index.php/JISRP/article/view/53561.
U. J. Ofem and G. Chukwujama, “Sustainable artificial intelligence-driven classroom assessment in higher institutions: Lessons from Estonia, China, the USA, and Australia for Nigeria,” Eur. J. Interact. Multimed. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, e02403, 2024, doi: 10.30935/ejimed/15265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/15265
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Muchamad Arif, Gunarti Dwi Lestari, Widodo, Andi Kristanto, Varia Virdania Virdaus, Anahita Ghanad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









