Comparative Analysis of INA-CBGs Tariffs and Unit Cost of Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review in Indonesian Hospitals
Keywords:
Unit cost, INA-CBGs, JKN, Sectio caesarea, Activity-based costingAbstract
The National Health Insurance (JKN) requires efficient, equitable, and sustainable healthcare services. However, various studies indicate discrepancies between INA-CBGs tariffs and actual hospital service costs. One of the procedures with the highest claim rates is Cesarean Section (CS), which exhibits significant disparities. This study aims to analyze the average unit cost associated with Cesarean Sections (CS) across Indonesia using the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) method. A systematic literature review (SLR) approach was employed, analyzing articles published between 2017–2024. Relevant articles were retrieved through the Google Scholar database. Of the 79 articles initially identified, 37 passed the preliminary screening, and 12 articles met all inclusion criteria. Results indicate that INA-CBGs tariffs for CS procedures only cover 25%–54% of actual costs, varying by service class, hospital location, and operational efficiency. This mismatch contributes to financial deficits in hospitals, potentially compromising service quality, restricting medical equipment procurement, and increasing healthcare professionals’ workloads. Moreover, regional cost variations demonstrate that the current tariff system inadequately considers geographic factors and service complexity. Hospitals in major cities like Bandung report nearly double the unit costs compared to regions such as Yogyakarta or Lampung. Therefore, findings highlight the necessity of reformulating INA-CBGs tariffs to better reflect hospitals' actual conditions. Without updates based on cost-of-service, the financing system risks perpetuating service disparities and reducing the quality of national healthcare. The review findings indicate that the actual cost of Cesarean Section (CS) procedures in Indonesian hospitals is significantly higher than the INA-CBGs tariffs reimbursed by BPJS, with disparities ranging from 46% to 75%.
Downloads
References
D. Satriawan, A. J. Pitoyo, and S. R. Giyarsih, “Cakupan Kesehatan Universal ( UHC ) Pekerja Sektor Informal di Indonesia Universal Health Coverage ( UHC ) Informal Sector Workers in Indonesia,” Tata Loka, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 556–572, 2020.
F. A. Pribadi and E. Setijaningrum, “Analisis Prinsip Pembiayaan Kesehatan dalam Mendukung Cakupan Kesehatan Semesta di Indonesia,” Jejaring Adm. Publik, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 60–78, 2023, doi: 10.20473/jap.v15i2.49582.
A. Risdiyanti, H. Paramu, and Sunarto, “Health Financing Analysis of Minimum Service Standards in the Health Sector,” Indones. J. Heal. Adm., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 62–73, 2024, doi: 10.20473/JAKI.V12I1.2024.62-73.
D. Leonard et al., “Sosialisasi Pelaksanaan Sistem INA-CBGs di Pelayanan Kesehatan,” J. Abdidas, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 842–846, 2021, doi: 10.31004/abdidas.v1i6.222.
S. Dewi, A. Meliala, and A. S. Ambbarriani, “DISPARITAS TARIF INA-CBGS DAN TARIF RUMAH SAKIT PASIEN BPJSRAWAT INAP DI RSUD KOLONODALE, KABUPATEN MOROWALI UTARA,” 2019.
Y. Nilmawati, A. Yanie, and M. M. A. Saputera, “Analisis Selisih Biaya Riil Dan Tarif Paket INA-CBG’s Dengan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Biaya Pada Pasien JKN Rawat Inap Di Klinik Utama Setara Barito Kuala,” J. Farm. SYIFA, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–21, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.63004/jfs.v3i1.604.
Y. T. Utami and N. Fanny, “Faktor Penyebab Perbedaan Selisih Klaim Negatif Tarif Ina-Cbgs dengan Tarif Riil di RSUD Dr. Moewardi,” J. Sains dan Kesehat., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 492–499, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.25026/jsk.v3i3.605.
S. Romando Putri et al., “PERBEDAAN TARIF RUMAH SAKIT & TARIF INA-CBGS PELAYANAN RAWAT INAP KASUS SECTIO CAESAREA DI RSUD KALIDERES TAHUN 2022,” J. Kesehat. Tambusai, vol. 4, pp. 5211–5216, 2023.
M. D. Saputra and M. Agus Putrayasa, “Analisis Activity Based Costing dalam Menentukan Besarnya Tarif Jasa Rawat Inap,” J. Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 133, 2018, doi: 10.31940/jbk.v14i3.1020.
B. Ouakhzan and C. Boukhalfa, “Application of the by the activity-based costing (ABC) method in a clinical department: example of the maternity unit of the Tiznit Provincial Hospital Center,” PubMed, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1684/mst.2019.0921.
E. Sunariyanti, T. M. Andayani, D. Endarti, and D. A. Puspandari, “Cost Analysis of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in Indonesia,” Clin. Outcomes Res., vol. 15, no. July, pp. 621–629, 2023, doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S388547.
M. Javid, M. Hadian, H. Ghaderi, S. Ghaffari, and M. Salehi, “Application of the Activity-Based Costing Method for Unit-Cost Calculation in a Hospital,” Glob. J. Health Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 2016, doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p165.
J. Odhiambo et al., “Health Facility Cost of Cesarean Delivery at a Rural District Hospital in Rwanda Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing,” Matern. Child Health J., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 613–622, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2674-z.
S. P. Samsul, M. Rum, and A. Hasan, “Review of Hospitalization Rates Using Activity Based Costing Method at Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Mamajang in Makassar Area,” Econ. J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2022, doi: 10.31850/economos.v5i3.2047.
A. Rajabi and A. Dabiri, “Applying activity based costing (ABC) method to calculate cost price in hospital and remedy services,” Iran. J. Public Health, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 100–107, 2012.
M. KARAHAN GÖKMEN, B. YABANA KİREMİT, and E. DİKMETAŞ YARDAN, “Activity Based Costing in Health Institutions: An Application in Gynecology Clinic of a Public Hospital,” Turkiye Klin. J. Heal. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 112–121, 2020, doi: 10.5336/healthsci.2019-66441.
D. Vantissha, A. H. Azizah, and S. Arifin, “Assessing Hospital Management Information Systems Success Using Human Organization and Technology Fit Model,” Appl. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2022, doi: 10.15408/aism.v5i1.24738.
E. Rachmawati et al., “Analysis of the Market Structure of Hospital Industry in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Heal. Adm., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2024, doi: 10.20473/JAKI.V12I1.2024.37-48.
A. Munandar, “a Qualitative Study of Health Services Costing in Indonesia,” J. Aisyah J. Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1781–1789, 2023, doi: 10.30604/jika.v8i4.2502.
E. Nurfitriani, N. Yuniar, R. Tosepu, S. Yusran, A. Zainuddin, and Suhadi, “Analysis of the Need for Health Workers Using Workload Indicator Staffing Need (Wisn) Method in Inpatient Services in Regional General Hospital of Buton Utara Regency in 2021,” Int. J. Res. -GRANTHAALAYAH, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 155–163, 2021, doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i7.2021.4077.
M. Basabih, E. Prasojo, and A. Y. S. Rahayu, “Hospital services under public-private partnerships, outcomes and, challenges: A literature review,” J. Public health Res., vol. 11, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1177/22799036221115781.
A. Sungkar, B. I. Santoso, R. Surya, and A. N. Fattah, “Classifying cesarean section using Robson Classification: An Indonesian tertiary hospital survey,” Maj. Obstet. Ginekol., vol. 27, no. 2, p. 66, 2019, doi: 10.20473/mog.v27i22019.66-70.
N. P. Sambodo, E. Van Doorslaer, M. Pradhan, and R. Sparrow, “Does geographic spending variation exacerbate healthcare benefit inequality? A benefit incidence analysis for Indonesia,” Health Policy Plan., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1129–1139, 2021, doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab015.
M. R. Ashari and R. Y. Ridwan, “Perhitungan Tarif Tindakan Sectio Caesarea Dengan Metode Activity Based Costing (ABC) System Di Rumah Sakit Umum Anutapura Palu Kontak,” J. Heal. Educ. Lit., vol. 4, pp. 57–64, 2021.
E. Glaeser et al., “Costing of cesarean sections in a government and a non-governmental hospital in cambodia—a prerequisite for efficient and fair comprehensive obstetric care,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218085.
P. Binyaruka and A. T. Mori, “Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07386-0.
M. Simanjuntak, Destanul Aulia, and Zulfendri, “The Analysis of Differences in Hospital Rill Rates and INA-CBG’s Rate on Sectio Caesare Action in RSU. Imelda Pekerja Indonesia Medan 2019,” Britain Int. Exact Sci. J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2021, doi: 10.33258/bioex.v3i2.442.
S. Syafrawati, R. Machmud, S. M. Aljunid, and R. Semiarty, “Incidence of moral hazards among health care providers in the implementation of social health insurance toward universal health coverage: evidence from rural province hospitals in Indonesia,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147709.
L. Handayani and L. Pratiwi, “UNIT COST RUMAH SAKIT DAN TARIF INA-CBGS: SUDAHKAH PEMBIAYAAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RUMAH SAKIT DIBAYAR DENGAN LAYAK? Hospital Unit cost and INA-CBGs Tariff : Is The Hospital Health Services Paid Fair?,” Kemenkes RI, pp. 219–227, 2018, doi: 10.22435/hsr.v2Ii4.45.
C. F. Sari et al., “Penegakan Kode Etik Tanggung Jawab Profesi Tenaga Kesehatan,” vol. 02, no. 07, pp. 526–531, 2023.
M. V. Diana Davisca Ridwan, Erliany Syaodih, “Perhitungan Tarif Rumah Sakit dengan Metode Activity Based Costing pada Layanan Operasi Caesar Pasien JKN RSIA Kota Bandung,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 411–429, 2024.
S. Rahmawati, M. A. Graber, M. Hakimi, A. G. Mukti, I. Bastian, and N. Rahman, “Cost comparison of emergency cesarean section in indonesia: The impact of australian model of diagnosis-related groups as a payment system for patient care in hospitals,” Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 216–223, 2021, doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.5831.
WHO, “Caesarean section rates continue to rise amid growing inequalities in access.”
M. Barati, F. Azami, B. Nagdi, M. Foladi, M. Hajimaghsoudi, and S. A. Asadi, “Moral Hazards in Providing Health Services: A Review of Studies. Evidence Based Health Policy,” Manag. Econ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2018.
L. Asjanti, N. Fitriasari, and A. Djamhuri, “Redesigning Clinical Pathway of Elective Caesarean Section Using Activity-Based-Costing Reduce Exposure to Covid-19,” J. Account. Strateg. Financ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 71–90, 2021, doi: 10.33005/jasf.v4i1.145.
R. D. Monica, F. M. Firdaus, I. P. Lestari, Y. Suryati, D. Rohmayani, and A. Hendrati, “Analisis Perbedaan Tarif Riil Rumah Sakit dengan Tarif Ina-CBG’s Berdasarkan Kelengkapan Medis Pasien Rawat Inap pada Kasus Persalinan Sectio Caesarea guna Pengendalian Biaya Rumah Sakit TNI AU Dr. M. Salamun Bandung,” J. Manaj. Inf. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 96, 2021, doi: 10.33560/jmiki.v9i1.289.
C. M. Angolile, B. L. Max, J. Mushemba, and H. L. Mashauri, “Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action,” Heal. Sci. Reports, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274.
J. P. Souza et al., “Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: The 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health,” BMC Med., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 71, 2010, doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
P. P. Widodo, T. Hariyanto, and A. Djamhuri, “Analysis of Sectio Caesarea Unit Cost As a Basis To Recommend the Price,” J. Apl. Manaj., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 563–569, 2017, doi: 10.21776/ub.jam2017.015.04.02.
F. A. Haq, F. Pribadi, and A. Akrom, “Elective caesarean section cost efficiency with time-driven activity-based costing,” Int. J. Public Heal. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 155–163, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijphs.v12i1.21963.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 RIZMA ADLIA SYAKURAH, Edwin Frymaruwah , Muhimatul Mufarikhah , Meiliza Izzatika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









