TPACK Theoretical Correspondence with Learning Variables and Its Application Effectiveness in Learning

https://doi.org/10.56741/jpes.v2i03.402

Authors

Keywords:

Flipp Classroom Strategy, Learning Strategy , TPACK, Virtual Laboratory

Abstract

The role of educational technology is to facilitate people to learn more efficiently to achieve optimal learning outcomes. One thing that can be done is to promote learning using learning media. However, this learning media will be effective with the right learning strategy. This study aimed to describe the correspondence of the TPACK framework with learning variables in educational technology in the digital era based on literature studies of the effectiveness of implementing the flipped classroom learning strategy assisted by virtual laboratory media on understanding mathematical concepts through pre-experimental studies. The subjects of this study were researchers, teachers, and 8th-grade students of SMPN 5 Abiansemal-Badung-Bali in the even semester of the academic year 2022/2023. The data collection instrument was a test of understanding mathematical concepts. Literature study data analysis was conducted by searching relevant theories and collecting articles, data reduction, discussion, and conclusions. The pre-experimental study was carried out by calculating the value of the students' pre-test and post-test gain scores for understanding mathematical concepts. There is a description of the correspondence of the TPACK framework with learning variables in educational technology: Technology elements correspond to condition variables; Paedagogy corresponds to method; and content knowledge corresponds to the outcome variables. The gain score of understanding students' mathematical concepts by applying the flipped classroom assisted by the virtual laboratory obtained 28% of students achieving the high criteria, 48% attaining moderate criteria, and 24% receiving low criteria. Thus, the flipped classroom learning strategy assisted by virtual laboratory media effectively increases students' understanding of mathematical concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ni Nyoman Parwati, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

is a lecturer in the Masters and Doctoral Program in Educational Technology at the Undiksha Postgraduate Program. She is a Professor in Mathematics Education Technology. Her research interest and community service is in Mathematics education technology. She often receives research and community service grants as chairman, funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. (email: nyoman.parwati@undiksha.ac.id).

I Gusti Putu Suharta, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

is a lecturer in the Masters and Doctoral program in  Mathematics Education at the Undiksha Postgraduate Program. He is a Professor in the field of Mathematics Education. His research interest and community service is in the area of Mathematics Education. He has held the position of Director of Postgraduate Undiksha and is currently entrusted with being the Director of Resources and Learning for Undiksha. (email: putu.suharta@undiksha.ac.id).

I Gde Wawan Sudatha, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

is a lecturer in the Masters's and Doctoral Programs in Educational Technology at the Undiksha Postgraduate Program. He is a candidate Professor in Educational Technology. His research interest and community service is in digital-based educational technology. Subjects taught in technology and technology implementation in learning include Learning Media, E-Learning, and Learning Multimedia. (email: igdewawans@undiksha.ac.id).

References

Abdul Bujang, S. D., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., & Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Digital learning demand for future education 4.0-case studies at Malaysia education institutions. Informatics, 7(13), https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013

Kümmel, E., Moskaliuk, J., Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2020). Digital learning environments in higher education: A literature review of individual vs social settings' role in measuring learning outcomes. Education Sciences, 10(78). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030078

Lase, D. (2019). Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. SUNDERMANN: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi, Pendidikan, Sains, Humaniora Dan Kebudayaan. https://doi.org/10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18

Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds. . . (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon, MA (Pearson Education Group).

Yunus, R. (2018). The Cybernetic Learning Theory and Its Implementation. Journal of Education Science, 4(2), 32-41.

Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784

Fahadi, M., & Khan, M. S. H. (2022). Technology-enhanced Teaching in Engineering Education: Teachers’ Knowledge Construction Using TPACK Framework. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15229a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15229a

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators. In ICT integrated teacher education Models.

Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C. H., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Research trend on TPACK through bibliometric analysis (2015-2019). International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1375-1385. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.22062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22062

Nova, N., Degeng, I. N., & Sulton, S. (2021). Pengembangan E-Modul Pembelajaran Agama Kristen Menggunakan Scaffolding untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognitif Komunitas Remaja Kristen Sumba. Edcomtech Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p069

Budiningsih, C. A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.

Dwiyogo, W. D. (2018). Developing a blended learning-based method for problem-solving in capability learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 51-61.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2020). Experiments, quasi-experiments, single-case research and meta-analysis. In Research Methods in Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053-23

Tangka, G., & Tani, D. (2022). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis PhET pada Materi Larutan Asam Basa di SMA N 1 Likupang. Jurnal Oxygenius, 4(1), 17-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v4i1.348

Khairudin, M., Triatmaja, A. K., Istanto, W. J., & Azman, M. N. A. (2019). Mobile virtual reality to develop a virtual laboratory for digital engineering. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 80-98. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208536/.

Santos, M. L., & Prudente, M. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in science education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598

Vasiliadou, R. (2020). Virtual laboratories during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48, 482-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21407

Lyublinskaya, I., & Kaplon-Schilis, A. (2022). Analysis of Differences in the Levels of TPACK: Unpacking Performance Indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric. Education Sciences, 12(2): 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020079

Wang, A. Y. (2022). Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9935-9952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4

Ibrohim, I., Purwaningsih, E., Munzil, M., Hidayanto, E., Sudrajat, A. K., Saefi, M., & Hassan, Z. bin. (2022). Possible links between Indonesian science teacher’s TPACK perception and demographic factors: Self-reported survey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(9), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12282

Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., Desai, S., Schmidt, A., Andreasen, J. B., Saderholm, J., Amick, L., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching Mathematics with Technology: TPACK and Effective Teaching Practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133

Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. R. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 3(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110

Saçak, B., Bozkurt, A., & Wagner, E. (2022). Learning Design versus Instructional Design: A Bibliometric Study through Data Visualization Approaches. Education Sciences, 12(11), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110752

Saubern, R., Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Redmond, P. (2020). TPACK-time to reboot?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.6378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6378

Published

2023-10-05

How to Cite

Parwati, N. N., Suharta, I. G. P., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2023). TPACK Theoretical Correspondence with Learning Variables and Its Application Effectiveness in Learning. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 2(03), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.56741/jpes.v2i03.402

Plaudit