Reconceptualizing Integrity Crisis Management in State-Owned Enterprises: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the 2025 Fuel Adulteration Scandal

Authors

  • Gita Cahya Aulia Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Zachwa Maulani Salsabilla Arsitatri Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Nurul Aprilia Fitri Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Muhammad Rifqy Ananda Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Pramudya Ibnu Subrata Universitas Slamet Riyadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002155


Keywords:

Crisis Communication, Digital Firestorms, Moral Integrity, Radical Accountability, State-Owned Enterprises

Abstract

This research explores the critical shift in crisis communication management within State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), focusing on PT Pertamina (Persero) during the 2025 fuel contamination crisis. The study aims to bridge the gap between Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and the unique socio-political burdens faced by state entities by proposing a new framework, the "Radical Accountability" model. Utilizing a qualitative conceptual approach, the methodology employs integrative literature synthesis and narrative case deconstruction. Data from secondary sources, including official corporate reports, social media discourse on TikTok and X, and reputable academic journals, were triangulated to identify systemic patterns of communication failure and the "transparency paradox" inherent in highly regulated industries. Findings reveal that moral integrity crises in SOEs trigger extreme public anger and "ontological insecurity" that conventional technical accidental models cannot resolve. The analysis identifies a structural conflict where bureaucratic rigidity and state secrecy collide with the public's demand for instant digital accountability. To address this, the proposed "Integrity Recovery Model" offers a three-phase strategic response: immediate symbolic action, systematic legal accountability, and the restoration of public sovereignty. This article extends SCCT by integrating energy sovereignty and moral integrity as core reputational assets. It shifts the role of Public Relations from reactive image management to evidence-based trust facilitation, providing a strategic blueprint for SOEs to navigate digital firestorms in the post-truth era by aligning communication narratives with tangible judicial interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gita Cahya Aulia, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

is an undergraduate student in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia. Her academic interests include management studies, particularly in the areas of organizational management, business strategy, and contemporary business development. Through her academic pursuits, she actively engages in exploring management-related issues and theoretical perspectives that contribute to the development of management science. This article is part of her academic effort to analyze and discuss relevant topics within the field of management studies. (email: gitacaulia@gmail.com).

Zachwa Maulani Salsabilla Arsitatri, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

is an undergraduate student in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, at Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Jalan Sumpah Pemuda No. 18, Joglo, Banjarsari, Surakarta, Central Java 57136, Indonesia. Her primary research interests include crisis management, digital public relations, and the dynamics of state endeavors to explore and discuss contemporary issues within the field of management (email: zachwarsy@gmail.com).

Nurul Aprilia Fitri, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

is a student in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia. This research is part of her academic activities, which focus on crisis management and organizational communication. In this article, the author examines the integrity management crisis in State Owned Enterprises (BUMN), specifically related to the 2025 fuel blending scandal and the crisis communication strategy to restore public trust through a multi-stakeholder perspective. (email: nurulapriliya050@gmail.com).

Muhammad Rifqy Ananda, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

is a student in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia. This research is part of an academic activity focused on the study of crisis management and organizational communication. Through this article, the author examines the issue of integrity crises in State Owned Enterprises (BUMN), specifically related to the alleged fuel mixing case in 2025. Furthermore, this research also reviews the crisis communication strategies used to restore public trust using a multi-stakeholder perspective approach. (email: rirqyananda8@gmail.com).

Pramudya Ibnu Subrata, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

is a lecturer and researcher at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia. His primary research interests are focused on the fields of Marketing Management and Public Relations. With extensive academic experience, he has contributed to various national and international scholarly publications and continues to dedicate his expertise to the advancement of management studies within the Indonesian academic landscape. (email: udapramudya12@gmail.com).

References

R. M. Siahaan, “The intersection of energy sovereignty and crisis communication: A study of Indonesian SOEs,” International Journal of Strategic Communication, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112–129, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2024.2310456.

W. T. Coombs, Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2023.

A. Pratama and S. Wijaya, “Digital accountability in state owned enterprises: Managing public trust during energy crises,” Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 25, no. 1, Art. no. e2845, 2025, doi: 10.1002/pa.2845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2845

K. Walker, Energy Security and Global Politics: The Strategic Importance of Resource Management. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2022.

D. Handojo, “The velocity of crisis: Analyzing digital firestorms in Indonesian state owned enterprises,” Public Relations Review, vol. 51, no. 2, Art. no. 102456, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102456.

A. B. Kusuma and W. P. Sari, “Algorithmic bias and brand sabotage: A study on consumer trust degradation in high regulated industries,” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 100201, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100201.

T. L. Tuten, Social Media Marketing: Theory and Practice, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2023.

M. F. Baswedan, “Navigating the secrecy transparency paradox in energy state owned enterprises,” Energy Policy Journal, vol. 188, Art. no. 114002, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114002.

R. W. Grant, Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Corporate Governance and State Accountability. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2023.

H. S. Wijaya, “Legitimizing state owned entities in the age of radical transparency: A public relations perspective,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 245–263, 2025, doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2024-0156.

A. M. Pangestu, “Beyond technical failures: Re-evaluating moral integrity in energy sector crisis management,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 415–430, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jccm.12567.

T. L. Sellnow and M. W. Seeger, Theorizing Crisis Communication, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2023.

F. Rahmansyah and D. Utami, “The socio-political burden of state owned enterprises: A new paradigm for public relations in developing economies,” International Journal of Strategic Communication, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 58–77, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2024.2398710.

R. Aditya and H. Harun, “From silence to radical accountability: A new era of crisis management for Southeast Asian SOEs,” Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2025.2345678.

P. R. Smith and Z. Zook, Marketing Communications: Offline and Online Integration, Engagement and Analytics. London, U.K.: Kogan Page, 2024.

L. S. Wijaya, “Post-truth crisis communication: Rebuilding public trust in state owned energy companies,” Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2026, doi: 10.1057/s41299-025-00189-y.

E. Jaakkola, “Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches,” AMS Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

D. J. MacInnis, “A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 136–154, 2011, doi: 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136

H. Snyder, Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Y. Xiao and M. Watson, “Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 93–112, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0739456X17723341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

R. L. Heath, The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2024.

W. L. Benoit, Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Restoration Theory and Research, 3rd ed. Albany, NY, USA: State Univ. of New York Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438496085

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

Aulia, G. C., Arsitatri, Z. M. S., Fitri, N. A., Ananda, M. R., & Subrata, P. I. (2026). Reconceptualizing Integrity Crisis Management in State-Owned Enterprises: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the 2025 Fuel Adulteration Scandal. Jurnal Genesis Indonesia, 5(02), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002155

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)