Natural Disaster Classification Using MobileNet with Transfer Learning
Keywords:
MobileNetv2, Natural Disasters, SEMMA, SMOTE, Transfer LearningAbstract
Natural disasters are events caused by natural phenomena that cause massive damage and pose a threat to human safety. Based on EM-DAT data (2000–2025), there have been more than 10,000 global disasters, resulting in millions of casualties and trillions of US dollars in losses. Notably, 2024 saw US$320 billion in losses due to extreme weather. This condition emphasizes the importance of an accurate disaster classification system for mitigation and rapid response. This study aims to develop a natural disaster image classification model using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method with a Transfer Learning approach using the MobileNetV2 architecture, which is known to be efficient and lightweight. This study employs the SEMMA (Sample, Explore, Modify, Model, Assess) methodology, beginning with sampling, which involves collecting image data from various open sources, such as Kaggle and previous literature. The data is then processed through the selection, cleaning, and normalization stages. Data exploration is conducted to understand class distribution and detect data imbalance. To overcome this problem, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and image data augmentation (such as rotation, flipping, and contrast adjustment) were used to enrich the training data variation. The pre-trained MobileNetV2 model was then retrained using the modified data, with adjustments to hyperparameters to achieve optimal performance. The evaluation was conducted using various metrics, namely accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix, and AUC-ROC curve. The results demonstrate that the combination of Transfer Learning, data augmentation, and SMOTE can enhance model performance, achieving an accuracy of up to 99% and an AUC-ROC above 0.99 on public test data. Additionally, testing on 26 private test images yielded an accuracy of 92.31%, with 24 of the 26 images classified correctly. These findings confirm that the combination of MobileNetV2, augmentation, and SMOTE effectively improves multi-class classification performance on natural disaster images. Furthermore, the use of a relatively lightweight model makes this system more efficient to implement on devices with limited resources, thereby supporting disaster mitigation and rapid response efforts.
Downloads
References
M. F. Al Halik and L. Septiana, “Data Analysis for Predicting Disaster-Prone Areas in West Java Using K-Means Clustering Algorithm,” J. Inf. Syst. Applied, Manag. Account. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 856–870, 2022, doi: 10.52362/jisamar.v6i4.939.
BNPB, “Definition of Disaster,” bnpb.go.id. Accessed: Jan. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://bnpb.go.id/definisi-bencana
Munich RE, “Natural disasters 2024: Climate change is showing its claws.” [Online]. Available: https://www.munichre.com/en/company/media-relations/media-information-and-corporate-news/media-information/2025/natural-disaster-figures-2024.html
EM-DAT, “Monitoring hazards & disasters worldwide since 1988.” [Online]. Available: https://www.emdat.be/
W. H. Achmad, N. Saurina, N. Chamidah, and R. Rulaningtyas, “Tuberculosis Classification Modeling Using Convolutional Neural Network,” Pros. Semin. Implementasi Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2023, doi: 10.31284/p.semtik.2023-1.3989.
A. Anindyo Abhinowo, R. Rizal Isnanto, and D. Eridani, “The Best Model Selection of Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm for Natural Disaster Classification,” J. Tek. Komput., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 199–208, 2023, doi: 10.14710/jtk.v1i4.37656.
K. A. Sheth, R. P. Kulkarni, and G. K. Revathi, “Enhancing natural disaster image classification: an ensemble learning approach with inception and CNN models,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 15, no. 1, p., 2024, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2024.2407029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2407029
M. Aamir et al., “Natural disasters intensity analysis and classification based on multispectral images using multi‐layered deep convolutional neural network,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21082648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082648
I. Cinar, “Disaster Detection Using Machine Learning Methods with Deep Features DisasterrDetectionnUsinggMachineeLearninggMethodss withhDeeppFeatures IlkayyCINAR,” no. April, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370599940
M. Sobhana, S. C. Chaparala, D. N. V. S. L. S. Indira, and K. K. Kumar, “A disaster classification application using convolutional neural network by performing data augmentation,” vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1712–1720, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v27.i3.pp1712-1720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v27.i3.pp1712-1720
M. Z. Alam, T. Roy, H. M. N. Kawsar, and I. Rimi, “Enhancing Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification with SMOTE: A Comparative Study,” no. December, pp. 20–22, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20235
A. P. Ningrum, S. Winarno, and V. Praskatama, “Classification of Soybean Quality Using Transfer Learning Convolutional Neural Network and SMOTE,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155–164, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52158/jacost.v5i2.1002
A. W. Salehi et al., “A Study of CNN and Transfer Learning in Medical Imaging: Advantages, Challenges, Future Scope,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15075930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075930
L. Yong, L. Ma, D. Sun, and L. Du, “Application of MobileNetV2 to waste classification,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 3 March, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282336
M. Pradnyatama, C. A. Sari, E. H. Rachmawanto, and H. M. M. Islam, “A Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN): MobileNetV2 and Xception for Butterfly Species Classification,” J. Masy. Inform., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69–90, 2025, doi: 10.14710/jmasif.16.1.72957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmasif.16.1.72957
S. M. Hassan, A. K. Maji, M. Jasiński, Z. Leonowicz, and E. Jasińska, “Identification of plant-leaf diseases using cnn and transfer-learning approach,” Electron., vol. 10, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10121388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10121388
D. Kurniadi, F. Nuraeni, and S. M. Lestari, “Implementation of the Naïve Bayes Algorithm Using Feature Forward Selection and SMOTE to Predict the Accuracy of Undergraduate Study Periods,” J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 63–82, 2022, doi: 10.37396/jsc.v5i2.215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37396/jsc.v5i2.215
Rachmat Santoso, “Data Augmentation on Metal Inscriptions for Kawi Script Detection,” J. Fasilkom, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 234–241, 2024, doi: 10.37859/jf.v14i1.6952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v14i1.6952
M. Xu, S. Yoon, A. Fuentes, and D. S. Park, “A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learning,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 137, p. 109347, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109347
J. Dean, Big Data, Data Mining, and Machine Learning. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118691786
Q. Chen and S. Lee, “A machine learning approach to predict customer usage of a home workout platform,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 21, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11219927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219927
L. Andrade-arenas, I. Rubio-paucar, C. Yactayo-arias, and C. Yactayo-arias, “Predictive models in Alzheimer ’ s disease : an evaluation based on data mining techniques,” vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2988–3002, 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2988-3002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2988-3002
M. Elgendy, Deep Learning for Vision Systems. Shelter Island NY: Manning Publications, 2020.
S. Clara, D. Laksmi Prianto, R. Al Habsi, E. Friscila Lumbantobing, and N. Chamidah, “Feature Selection Implementation in Machine Learning Classification Algorithms to Predict Income on Adult Income Dataset,” Semin. Nas. Mhs. Ilmu Komput. dan Apl. Jakarta-Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 741–747, 2021.
R. Roy, “Cyclone Wildfire Flood Earthquake Database,” kaggle.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rupakroy/cyclone-wildfire-flood-earthquake-database/data
F. Alam, T. Alam, M. A. Hasan, A. Hasnat, M. Imran, and F. Ofli, “MEDIC: a multi-task learning dataset for disaster image classification,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 2609–2632, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07717-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07717-0
P. M. Del Rosso, A. Sebastianelli, D. Spiller, P. P. Mathieu, and S. L. Ullo, “On-Board Volcanic Eruption Detection through CNNs and Satellite Multispectral Imagery,” pp. 1–16, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173479
Global Volcanism Program, Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, and Smithsonian Institution, “Database Search - Eruptions.” Accessed: Apr. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://volcano.si.edu/search_eruption.cfm
Y. Tynchenko et al., “Landslide Assessment Classification Using Deep Neural Networks Based on Climate and Geospatial Data,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 1–26, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16167063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167063
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
Copyright (c) 2026 Asri Mulyani, Dede Kurniadi, Gina Suciyana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












