Energy Efficiency Consumption of Building Planning Based on Indonesia Green Building Rules: A Case Study

Salsabila Ramadhanti; Yatnanta Padma Devia; Alwafi Pujiraharjo

doi:10.56741/IISTR.esl.001076

Authors

Salsabila Ramadhanti
salsabilasisi@student.ub.ac.id
University of Brawijaya
Yatnanta Padma Devia University of Brawijaya
Alwafi Pujiraharjo University of Brawijaya

Keywords:

Green Building, Energy efficiency, Daylighting, Elevator Efficiency, Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Abstract

This study evaluates the energy performance of the Tower B building in Riau Province, Indonesia, based on green building assessment criteria, with a focus on energy use efficiency. The initial design showed a total energy consumption of 2,255,923 kWh/year, corresponding to an Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of 95.46 kWh/m²/year, and earned a moderate energy score of 30 out of 46. Two operational strategies were proposed to address inefficiencies: (1) reducing the number of elevator units from six to four, and (2) implementing separate grouping of luminaires based on daylight exposure. Simulation results indicated that these strategies could reduce energy consumption in the elevator system by 33% and in the lighting system by 13%, without compromising user service standards. The combined application of both measures reduced total building energy use to 1,949,861 kWh/year (EUI 82.51 kWh/m²/year), yielding a 29% overall reduction and increasing the energy efficiency score to 38. While the results are promising, further research is needed to validate implementation through sensitivity analysis, behavioral modeling, and integration into regulatory frameworks. This study highlights the potential of adaptive operational strategies in optimizing building energy performance in tropical urban contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Salsabila Ramadhanti, University of Brawijaya

Department Of Civil Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering

Yatnanta Padma Devia, University of Brawijaya

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering

Alwafi Pujiraharjo, University of Brawijaya

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering

References

M. S. Hoesin, “Studi oleh IFC dan Green Building Council Indonesia menunjukkan sembilan Bangunan Gedung Hijau menghemat 30 - 80 persen biaya utilitas dibandingkan dengan bangunan pada umumnya,” Internaltional Financ. Corp., pp. 28–30, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://pressroom.ifc.org/all/pages/PressDetail.aspx?ID=24900. [Eng. Trans.: A study by IFC and the Green Building Council Indonesia shows that nine Green Buildings save 30–80 percent of utility costs compared to conventional buildings]

A. F. Tasya, P. Setijanti, and A. Dinapradipta, “Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Implementasi Strategi Efisiensi Energi Pada Bangunan Spazio,” Vitr. J. Arsit. Bangunan dan Lingkung., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 21, 2020, doi: 10.22441/vitruvian.2020.v10i1.003. [Eng. Trans.: Factors affecting the implementation of energy efficiency strategies in Spazio Building] DOI: https://doi.org/10.22441/vitruvian.2020.v10i1.003

G. Mahassin, “Model Konsumsi Energi Pada Bangunan Residensial Di Jakarta: Perbandingan Metode Rata-Rata Dan Median Serta Rekomendasi Efisiensi Energi,” pp. 55–58, 2024. [Eng. Trans.: Energy consumption model in residential buildings in Jakarta: Comparison of average and median methods and energy efficiency recommendations]

C. G. Buyang and F. Sangadji, “Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pattimura,” J. Simetrik, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 677–682, 2023, doi: 10.31959/js.v13i1.1384. [Eng. Trans.: Assessment of Green Building criteria at the Faculty of Engineering, Pattimura University] DOI: https://doi.org/10.31959/js.v13i1.1384

F. Çiner and N. Doǧan-Saǧlamtimur, “Environmental and sustainable aspects of green building: A review,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 706, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/706/1/012001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/706/1/012001

GBCI, “Perangkat Penilaian GREENSHIP (GREENSHIP Rating Tools),” Greensh. New Build. Versi 1.2, no. April, pp. 1–15, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://elib.artefakarkindo.co.id/dok/Tek_Ringkasan%20GREENSHIP%20NB%20V1.2%20-%20id.pdf. [Eng. Trans.: GREENSHIP assessment tools (GREENSHIP Rating Tools)]

D. M. Fatmayati, A. Trisiana, and L. A. Wicaksono, “Analisis Tingkat Capaian Green Building Berdasarkan Greenship untuk Bangunan Baru Versi 1.2 (Studi Kasus: Hotel Kokoon Banyuwangi),” J. Appl. Civ. Eng. Infrastruct. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2021, doi: 10.52158/jaceit.v2i1.150. [Eng. Trans.: Analysis of Green Building achievement level based on Greenship for new buildings version 1.2 (Case study: Kokoon Hotel Banyuwangi)] DOI: https://doi.org/10.52158/jaceit.v2i1.150

A. Ratnaningsih, A. Hasanuddin, and R. Hermansa, “Penilaian Kriteria Green Building Pada Pembangunan Gedung IsDB Project Berdasarkan Skala Indeks Menggunakan Greenship Versi 1.2 (Studi Kasus: Gedung Engineering Biotechnology Universitas Jember),” Berk. Sainstek, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 59, 2019, doi: 10.19184/bst.v7i2.12153. [Eng. Trans.: Assessment of Green Building criteria in the construction of IsDB Project building based on index scale using Greenship version 1.2 (Case study: Engineering Biotechnology Building, University of Jember)] DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/bst.v7i2.12153

S. M. Rosalia, A. Annisa, and S. Zuraida, “Evaluasi Sertifikasi Green Building pada Gedung Institut Teknologi & Sains Bandung,” J. Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 043–050, 2020, doi: 10.36870/japps.v2i2.183. [Eng. Trans.: Evaluation of Green Building certification in the Institut Teknologi & Sains Bandung building] DOI: https://doi.org/10.36870/japps.v2i2.183

D. Saputra, “Kantor Kementerian PUPR Masuk Jajaran Gedung Paling Hijau Se-ASEAN,” detik.com, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.detik.com/properti/berita/d-6898034/kantor-kementerian-pupr-masuk-jajaran-gedung-paling-hijau-se-asean. [Eng. Trans.: Ministry of PUPR office among the greenest buildings in ASEAN]

Kementerian PUPR, “Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penilaian Kinerja Bangunan Gedung Hijau,” pp. 1–297, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/217002/permen-pupr-no-21-tahun-2021. [Eng. Trans.: Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Housing of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2021 on Green Building Performance Assessment]

A. Divyadarshi et al., “Energy Consumption and Efficiency in Green Buildings,” IJSRD-International J. Sci. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. September 2020, pp. 2321–0613, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322273339.

Y. Geng, W. Ji, Z. Wang, B. Lin, and Y. Zhu, “A review of operating performance in green buildings: Energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction,” Energy Build., vol. 183, pp. 500–514, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017

A. K. Sharma, “Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort in Heritage Buildings,” Encycl. Renew. Sustain. Mater. Vol. 1-5, vol. 1–5, pp. 58–62, 2020, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10720-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10720-9

J. P. Kalikeri and S. U. Vanakudari, “Comparative Study of a Conventional Building and Green Building,” Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci., no. 09, 2023, doi: 10.56726/irjmets44828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS44828

Anisah, I. Inayati, F. X. N. Soelami, and R. Triyogo, “Identification of Existing Office Buildings Potential to Become Green Buildings in Energy Efficiency Aspect,” Procedia Eng., vol. 170, pp. 320–324, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.040

D. Bogin, M. Dorman, M. Kissinger, and E. Erell, “Beyond efficiency: Evaluation of the electricity saving potential of green residential buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 320, no. August, p. 114627, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114627

G. H. Oktavian, I. Wijatmiko, C. R. Nainggolan, Y. P. Devia, and M. R. Anwar, “Energy Efficient Design of Building Based on Building Information Modelling (BIM),” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 31–38, 2024, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2024.16.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2024.16.04.005

S. Karya et al., “Sustainability in Architecture EVALUASI PERFORMA DESAIN SELUBUNG BANGUNAN TERHADAP Arsitektur untuk Indonesia Timur,” pp. 260–270, 2020. [Eng. Trans.: Sustainability in architecture: Evaluation of building envelope design performance for Eastern Indonesia architecture]

T. Suheta and M. F. Huda, “Audit Penggunaan Energi Listrik Pada Apartment Metropolis Surabaya,” Semin. Nas. Sains dan Teknol. Ter. V, vol. 10, pp. 91–98, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/reader/289705280

. [Eng. Trans.: Audit of electricity usage in Metropolis Apartment Surabaya]

A. Fleta, “Analisis Pencahayaan Alami Dan Buatan Pada Ruang Kantor Terhadap Kenyamanan Visual Pengguna,” J. Patra, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021. [Eng. Trans.: Analysis of natural and artificial lighting in office spaces on user visual comfort]

Atthaillah, A. Bakhtiar, and Badriana, “Optimalisasi Pencahayaan Alami dengan Useful Daylight Illuminance pada,” J. Nat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–26, 2019. [Eng. Trans.: Optimization of natural lighting with Useful Daylight Illuminance] DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/nature.v6i1a2

R. A. Mangkuto, A. W. Wiratama, K. Fadla, and F. X. N. Soelami, “Optimisasi Perletakan dan Penjadwalan Sistem Pencahayaan untuk Meningkatkan Eksitansi Rata-rata Permukaan dalam Ruang,” J. Permukim., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 45, 2019, doi: 10.31815/jp.2019.14.45-54. [Eng. Trans.: Optimization of lighting placement and scheduling to increase average surface illuminance in rooms] DOI: https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2019.14.45-54