Decarbonization in Maritime Technology A Scoping Review of Alternative Fuels, Energy Systems, and Policy Pathways Toward Net-Zero Shipping
Main Article Content
Abstract
The decarbonization of the maritime sector represents a complex socio-technical transition rather than a purely technological shift, requiring the alignment of fuels, energy systems, and regulatory frameworks. Despite rapid innovation, the field remains fragmented, with competing technological pathways and limited integration across system levels. Guided by the targets of the International Maritime Organization, this study conducts a scoping review of literature published between 2020 and 2025 to critically examine how decarbonization strategies are conceptualized, developed, and operationalized. Using the PRISMA-ScR approach, this review synthesizes evidence across four interrelated domains: alternative fuels, energy efficiency technologies, electrification and hybrid systems, and digital optimization. Rather than identifying a dominant solution, the analysis reveals a persistent trade-off between technological maturity, scalability, and environmental impact. The findings highlight a systemic misalignment between technological innovation and supporting infrastructure, as well as a lack of integrated frameworks that connect engineering solutions with policy mechanisms. This review advances the literature by proposing an integrative perspective that reframes maritime decarbonization as a multi-layered transition problem, emphasizing cross-domain interoperability and policy-technology co-evolution. It identifies critical research gaps in hybrid energy systems, infrastructure readiness, and techno-economic scalability, and outlines a future research agenda centered on system integration and global implementation pathways toward net-zero shipping.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-05-07
Published 2026-05-08
Plaudit
References
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2023. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD, 2023, doi: 10.18356/9789213584569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213584569
International Energy Agency, Tracking Transport 2023. Paris, France: IEA, 2023.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
International Maritime Organization, IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. London, U.K.: IMO, 2018.
M. Balcombe, D. Brierley, C. Lewis, L. Skatvedt, J. Speirs, A. Hawkes, and I. Staffell, “How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 182, pp. 72–88, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080
International Renewable Energy Agency, A Pathway to Decarbonising the Shipping Sector. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: IRENA, 2021.
DNV, Maritime Forecast to 2050. Høvik, Norway: DNV, 2023.
World Bank, The Role of Digitalization in Maritime Transport. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2022.
F. W. Geels, “Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective,” Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 495–510, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
A. McKinnon, “Decarbonizing logistics: Distributing goods in a low carbon world,” Transport Reviews, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1357702.
International Energy Agency, The Future of Hydrogen. Paris, France: IEA, 2019.
OECD, Decarbonising Maritime Transport: Pathways to Zero-Carbon Shipping. Paris, France: OECD Pulishing, 2021.
World Bank, Reducing Shipping GHG Emissions: Lessons from Developing Countries. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(21)00261-3
M. D. J. Peters et al., “Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews,” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2015, doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
J. Faber et al., Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020. London, U.K.: International Maritime Organization, 2020.
E. A. Bouman, E. Lindstad, A. H. Rialland, and M. Strømman, “State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 52, pp. 408–421, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
J. Brynolf, E. Fridell, and K. Andersson, “Environmental assessment of marine fuels: Liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas, methanol and bio-methanol,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 148, pp. 86–95, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.052
S. Psaraftis and C. Kontovas, “Decarbonization of maritime transport: Is there light at the end of the tunnel?,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 559, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12020559.
A. A. Van Biert, M. Godjevac, K. Visser, and P. V. Aravind, “A review of fuel cell systems for maritime applications,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 327, pp. 345–364, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.007
K. Hansson, S. Brynolf, E. Fridell, and K. Andersson, “The potential role of ammonia as marine fuel based on energy systems modeling and multi-criteria decision analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 265, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083265
X. Mao, R. Rutherford, K. Osorio-Tejada, and J. Lutsey, “Electric ferryboat applications in the maritime sector,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 78, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.004
M. Dominguez-Péry, L. A. Pons, and T. Renault, “Reducing maritime transport emissions: Hybrid propulsion systems and future pathways,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 187, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106175
E. Lindstad, H. Asbjørnslett, and A. H. Strømman, “Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3456–3464, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.044
H. Yasukawa and Y. Yoshimura, “Introduction of air lubrication system for ship drag reduction,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 130, pp. 279–289, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.047
M. Ammar and M. Seddiek, “Evaluation of waste heat recovery systems for marine applications,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 87, pp. 681–690, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.057
Y. Xiao, M. Wang, and H. Fu, “Artificial intelligence applications in maritime transport: A review,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 235, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109435
S. Psaraftis, “Decarbonization of maritime transport: To be or not to be?,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 22, pp. 353–371, 2020, doi: 10.1057/s41278-020-00163-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-018-0098-8
K. Hansson, E. Fridell, and S. Brynolf, “On the potential of ammonia as fuel for shipping,” Energy Policy, vol. 145, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111734
S. Psaraftis and C. Kontovas, “Green maritime transportation: A review of challenges and opportunities,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13010365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010237
M. Brynolf, F. Grahn, and H. Taljegard, “Marine fuels and decarbonization pathways,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 279, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123654
T. A. Johansen and T. Perez, “Ship collision avoidance and COLREGs compliance using artificial intelligence,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 50, pp. 170–186, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.004.
B. Meechan, J. McLaughlin, and R. Doherty, “Pathways toward shipping decarbonization: A systematic review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 169, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112798.
Y. Li et al., “Battery-electric ships for sustainable maritime transportation,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12040567.
M. Rossi et al., “Digital twin applications in maritime systems and shipping optimization,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 290, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116130
Z. Zhou et al., “Integrated maritime systems for sustainable shipping transitions,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 300, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117345.
T. A. Johansen and T. Perez, “Ship collision avoidance and COLREGs compliance using artificial intelligence,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 50, pp. 170–186, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.004
B. Meechan, J. McLaughlin, and R. Doherty, “Pathways toward shipping decarbonization: A systematic review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 169, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112798
Y. Li et al., “Battery-electric ships for sustainable maritime transportation,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12040567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040567
Z. Zhou et al., “Integrated maritime systems for sustainable shipping transitions,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 300, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117345