Assessment of the Level of Software Development Using CMMI-Dev 1.3 on the Unjani Official Web

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 18, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56741/bst.v4i03.1213
Keywords:
CMMI-DEV 1.3, GAP Analysis, SCAMPI Class C, UNJANI Website, Webometrics

Main Article Content

Gheral Naza Ghaniiy
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
Yulison Herry Chrisnanto
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-3049
Gunawan Abdillah
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Abstract

UNJANI website ranked 186 in Webometric ranking. Webometric is a ranking system of universities around the world conducted by Cybermetrics Labs which is useful to determine the ranking in terms of the level of performance indicators of universities, which include Visibility, Openness, Excellence. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of maturity of the software development process on the UNJANI website using CMMI Dev 1.3. This study uses quantitative methods, with a survey approach to the person in charge and manager of the UNJANI website. Quantitative research is a way to obtain research data measured using tools such as surveys, questionnaires, or experiments, and analysed with statistical methods to find certain patterns, relationships, or trends. The results of this study found that out of 7 CMMI Dev.1.3 process areas, some areas are in accordance with the standard process of making the UNJANI website and some process areas are not in accordance with the CMMI Dev 1.3 framework. The maturity level of the UNJANI website is in the category of partially implemented in most process areas, with the highest GAP (50%) in Configuration Management (CM) and the lowest GAP (30%) in Project Monitoring and Control (PMC). The conclusion of this research reveals that UNJANI website still needs improvement in configuration management, change recording, and feature quality evaluation before release.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ghaniiy, G. N., Chrisnanto, Y. H., & Abdillah, G. (2025). Assessment of the Level of Software Development Using CMMI-Dev 1.3 on the Unjani Official Web. Bincang Sains Dan Teknologi, 4(03), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.56741/bst.v4i03.1213
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 03 (2025): Bincang Sains dan Teknologi
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Gheral Naza Ghaniiy, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

is an Informatics graduate from Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, completing his degree in 2025. His undergraduate research focused on exploring technology-driven solutions within the field of informatics, reflecting his interest in software development and data-driven innovation. Throughout his study, he actively engaged in academic projects and collaborated with supervisors to strengthen his research skills. Gheral aims to continue developing his expertise in computing and contribute to technological advancement. (email: gheralnazag20@if.unjani.ac.id).

Yulison Herry Chrisnanto, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

is a lecturer at the Informatics Faculty, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, and served as the first supervisor for this research project. With academic and professional experience in informatics engineering, he is committed to guiding students in research and fostering innovation in computing. His teaching and supervision emphasize practical problem-solving, analytical thinking, and the development of high-quality academic work. He actively contributes to strengthening the university’s informatics research environment. (email: y.chrisnanto@gmail.com).

Gunawan Abdillah, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

is a lecturer at the Informatics Faculty, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, and served as the second supervisor for this research. His academic interests span computer science, informatics systems, and applied computational studies. He is actively involved in mentoring students, supporting research development, and enhancing academic quality within the department.Through his guidance, he encourages students to advance their technical competence and pursue excellence in informatics research and innovation. (email: aby_zakiyy@yahoo.com).

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Received 2025-07-05
Accepted 2025-12-14
Published 2025-12-18

Plaudit

References

I. Shehatta, A. M. Al-Rubaish, and K. Mahmood, ‘Ranking Web of Universities: Is Webometrics a Reliable Academic Ranking?’, Pak. J. Inf. Manag. Libr., pp. 103–135, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.47657/2631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47657/2631

S. Kunosić, D. Čeke, and E. Zerem, ‘Advantages and disadvantages of the webometrics ranking system’, Scientometr. Recent Adv., 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87207

S. Jeyashree and R. Ravichandran, ‘Perspectives of webometric tools for web impact assessment studies: A review’, Int. J. Libr. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 43–48, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.library.20130202.03

‘Ranking Web of Universities: Webometrics ranks 30000 institutions’, Webometrics. Accessed: Dec. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.webometrics.info/en/Asia/Indonesia ?page=1

A. B. Hakim, ‘Penerapan CMMI Pada Perusahaan Kecil: Studi Kasus PT. XYZ’, -STATEMENT, 2011.

I. Kurniawati, M. C. Saputra, and A. Rachmadi, ‘Penilaian Tingkat Kematangan Proses Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan Framework CMMI-Dev 1.3 Pada PT. ABC’, J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. Dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 6457–6466, 2018.

M. Eka Purnama Rijaludin, W. Witanti, and A. Id Hadiana, ‘Sistem Informasi Administrasi Persuratan Terintegrasi Jurusan Informatika dan Fakultas MIPA Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani’, J. Mnemon., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–31, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.36040/mnemonic.v1i1.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36040/mnemonic.v1i1.16

Y. Y. Asmy and L. P. Hasugian, ‘Penilaian Maturity Level Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan CMMI-Dev 1.3 pada Aplikasi Manans MINT’, J. Manaj. Inform. JAMIKA, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 158–173, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.34010/jamika.v11i2.5523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/jamika.v11i2.5523

W. Widodo, ‘Evaluasi Proses Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak pada Virtual Team Development Menggunakan CMMI Versi 1.3’, J. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.26555/jifo.v10i1.a3345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/jifo.v10i1.a3345

T. Kovacheva and N. Todorov, ‘Optimizing software development process: A case study for integrated Agile-CMMI process model’, presented at the 2011 IEEE EUROCON - International Conference on Computer as a Tool, IEEE, Apr. 2011, pp. 1–2. doi: 10.1109/eurocon.2011.5929328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROCON.2011.5929328

‘System and Software Development Process Improvement’, Process Improv. CMMI® Syst. Softw., pp. 161–190, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1201/9781420060515-c5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420060515-c5

B. Mutafelija and H. Stromberg, ‘Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)’, Process Improv. CMMI® V12 ISO Stand., pp. 25–64, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1201/9781420052848-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420052848-3

P. Joembunthanaphong and G. Sriharee, ‘The improvement process for the software development and requirements management to achieve capability level 3 of cmmi’, presented at the 2022 26th International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC), IEEE, 2022, pp. 296–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC56337.2022.10049356

S. Saheel, L. B. Rahman, F. Humaira, F. Sadia, and M. Hasan, ‘A new scrum and CMMI level 2 compatible model for small software firms in order to enhance their software quality’, presented at the Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, 2022, pp. 1607–1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3477314.3507173

P. K. Harkawat, ‘CMMI-Based Conceptual Project/Program Management & Measurement (PMM) Framework for Sustainable Lean Implementation & Mining Operations’, in Data-centric Approaches to Industrial Decisions: Technology, Digitisation and Business Decisions, Springer, 2025, pp. 233–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7556-2_13

A. Bertolini et al., ‘scAmpi—A versatile pipeline for single-cell RNA-seq analysis from basics to clinics’, PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 18, no. 6, p. e1010097, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010097

M. Zarour and M. Alenezi, ‘Software process improvement initiative in medium size IT organization: a case study’, Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 500–509, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v23.i1.pp500-509

A. Kurniawan, E. K. Budiardjo, and K. Mahatma, ‘Scrum best practices recommendation: a media and community startup case study’, presented at the 2021 International Conference Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems (ICADEIS), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADEIS52521.2021.9701958

‘“Quick and Dirty” Usability Tests’, Usability Eval. Ind., pp. 125–132, June 1996, doi: 10.1201/9781498710411-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-24

P. Vlachogianni and N. Tselios, ‘Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review’, J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 392–409, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938

M. A. Kosim, S. R. Aji, and M. Darwis, ‘Pengujian Usability Aplikasi Pedulilindungi Dengan Metode System Usability Scale (Sus)’, J Sist Inf Dan Sains Teknol, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31326/sistek.v4i2.1326

B. Antoro, ‘Kesalahan Sistematis Penggunaan Skala Likert dalam Penelitian: Analisis Systematic Literature Review’, J. Multidisiplin Sos. Dan Hum., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–81, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.70585/jmsh.v2i2.163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70585/jmsh.v2i2.163

G. Giachetti, J. L. de la Vara, and B. Marín, ‘Model-driven gap analysis for the fulfillment of quality standards in software development processes’, Softw. Qual. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 255–282, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09649-x

E. Gökalp and V. Martinez, ‘Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the digital transformation capability maturity model’, Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 6282–6302, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020