Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Learning
Fostering Growth Mindset and Critical Thinking in the Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.bei.002280
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Classroom Learning, Critical Thinking, Educational Technology, Growth Mindset
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed educational practices, especially in classroom learning environments. While AI provides opportunities for personalized learning, adaptive feedback, and enhanced engagement, concerns have also emerged regarding student dependency and reduced critical thinking skills. This study aims to explore the integration of AI in classroom learning and its relationship with growth mindset development among students. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research analyzes classroom learning strategies that utilize AI as a collaborative learning partner rather than as a replacement for human cognition. Data were obtained from literature studies and classroom learning observations focusing on AI-supported learning activities, critical thinking development, and growth mindset orientation. The findings indicate that AI can function effectively as a learning stimulus that encourages reflective thinking, supports student engagement, and facilitates feedback-driven learning processes. However, without proper guidance, AI may also lead to overreliance and reduced independent thinking. Therefore, teachers play a crucial role in guiding students to use AI responsibly and productively. The results show that AI integration combined with growth mindset principles can enhance learning motivation, promote resilience when facing academic challenges, and encourage collaborative knowledge construction. This research highlights the importance of pedagogical strategies that position AI as a learning partner while maintaining the central role of human reasoning and creativity in education.
Downloads
References
C. K. Y. Chan, “Who Is Doing the Thinking? AI as a Dynamic Cognitive Partner: A Learner-Informed Framework,” arXiv:2602.15638, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15638
C. Gonzalez and H. Heidari, “A cognitive approach to human–AI complementarity in dynamic decision-making,” Nature Reviews Psychology, vol. 4, pp. 808–822, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00499-x
O. Noroozi, C. Schunn, B. Schneider, and S. K. Banihashem, “Advancing peer learning with learning analytics and artificial intelligence,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 1, Art. no. 62, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00559-5
Z. Revesai, “Generative AI dependency: The emerging academic crisis and its impact on student performance—A case study of a university in Zimbabwe,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 2549787, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2549787
K. M. Kroeper, A. C. Fried, and M. C. Murphy, “Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: Identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindset beliefs to students,” Social Psychology of Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 371–398, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09689-4
L. Bardach, K. C. Bostwick, T. Fütterer, M. Kopatz, D. M. Hobbi, R. M. Klassen, and J. Pietschnig, “A meta-analysis on teachers’ growth mindset,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 36, no. 3, Art. no. 84, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09925-7
D. Padua, “Artificial intelligence and quality education: The need for digital culture in teaching,” Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, no. 30, pp. 181–193, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2024-030-padd
D. Henriksen, P. Mishra, and R. Stern, “Creative learning for sustainability in a world of AI: Action, mindset, values,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, Art. no. 4451, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114451
M. He, B. N. Abbasi, and J. He, “AI-driven language learning in higher education: An empirical study on self-reflection, creativity, anxiety, and emotional resilience in EFL learners,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05817-5
Y. Quan, “The role of AI-driven feedback in fostering growth mindset and engagement: A self-determination theory perspective,” Learning and Motivation, vol. 92, Art. no. 102192, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102192
D. Lee and S. Yeo, “Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics,” Computers & Education, vol. 191, Art. no. 104646, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2026.
C. Guan, J. Mou, and Z. Jiang, “Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis,” International Journal of Innovation Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 134–147, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA, USA: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.
R. Luckin et al., AI and the Future of Learning. London, U.K.: UCL Knowledge Lab, 2022.
T. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, Art. no. 39, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
UNESCO, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mita Ariyanti, Mustika Ayu, Zulia Maharani, Ika Maryani, Muhammad Ragil Kurniawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-07-08
Published 2026-07-11










