Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Research: Perspective of the Value and Norms of Researchers

Moch. Syihabudin Nuha; Usrotun Diniyah; Mario Martin Taneo; Nur Hidayah; Yuliati Hotifah

doi:10.56741/jgi.v3i03.714

Authors

Moch. Syihabudin Nuha
Moch.syihabudin.2301118@students.um.ac.id
State University of Malang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2765-5368
Usrotun Diniyah State University of Malang https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3974-7133
Mario Martin Taneo State University of Malang
Nur Hidayah State University of Malang
Yuliati Hotifah State University of Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/jgi.v3i03.714

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Norm of researcher, Research, Value of research

Abstract

The era of the industrial revolution has entered its peak in 5.0 which is an era where humans coexist full of technology. One of them is artificial intelligence and the products it produces such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, and artificial intelligence in other fields. In this era, humans will be given all kinds of conveniences from technology. The search for truth can be done quickly but less accurately. Artificial intelligence uses big data that will continue to be filled with various knowledge so that in the end intelligence can be utilized properly. The use of artificial intelligence technology in research conducted by researchers should still follow the rules, values, and norms in research. Values and norms in research will lead researchers to be open, fair, responsible, and skeptical of research results. The research method used is a literature study conducted by finding literature sources, reading literature, selecting literature, and analyzing related literature utilizing artificial intelligence in research. The purpose of this study is to find values and norms in research that uses artificial intelligence technology. The result of this study is that a researcher must have the value of objectivity, honesty, fairness, responsibility, stewardship, and openness and continue to develop skepticism, responsibility, ease of understanding, and critical thinking behavior that researchers must have. There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of artificial intelligence in research. The advantages include reference management, search for reference sources, plagiarism checking, and discussions between researchers. While the drawback is the critical thinking ability of researchers, plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification of research data. For this reason, good and responsible researchers must follow the values, values, and norms in research. Researchers must be responsible for the results of their research because the results of their research are a source of knowledge and will be read by readers widely.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Moch. Syihabudin Nuha, State University of Malang

is a graduate student of Guidance and Counseling at the State University of Malang. My research is interested in the field of Guidance and Counseling which focuses on problems faced by individuals ranging from personal-social, career, and academic aspects, including the field of guidance and counseling program evaluation and counselor evaluation. (email: Moch.syihabudin.2301118@students.um.ac.id).

Usrotun Diniyah, State University of Malang

has six years of experience as a counselor at one of the Junior High Schools (SMP) in Malang Regency. She has an undergraduate educational background in Guidance and Counseling at Tadulako University, and is currently continuing her Master's program in Guidance and Counseling at the State University of Malang. (email: Usrotun.diniyah.2301118@students.um.ac.id).

Mario Martin Taneo, State University of Malang

is a graduate student at the State University of Malang, majoring in Guidance and Counseling. In her academic studies, she has an interest in guidance and counseling approaches for student character development. She has been involved in several research projects focusing on the application of innovative guidance techniques. (email: Mario.martin.2301118@students.um.ac.id).

Nur Hidayah, State University of Malang

is a professor, and senior lecturer, in the field of guidance and counseling at the Malang State University. she is active in the development of education in the field of guidance and counseling including in various research and community service. (email: Nur.hidayah.fip@um.ac.id).

Yuliati Hotifah, State University of Malang

is a senior lecturer, associate professor, and researcher in the field of guidance and counseling at the Malang State University. She is involved in various research, development, and community service in the field of guidance and counseling. (email: Yuliati.hotifah.fip@um.ac.id).

References

M. R. Pabubung, “Epistemologi Kecerdasan Buatan (Ai) Dan Pentingnya Ilmu Etika Dalam Pendidikan Interdisipliner,” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 152–159, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jfi.v4i2.34734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i2.34734

L. Da Xu, “Special issue on system research on artificial intelligence,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 187–187, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/sres.2776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2776

R. Rosnawati, A. Syukri, B. Badarussyamsi, and A. F. Rizki, “Aksiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Manfaatnya Bagi Manusia,” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.36418/syntax-idea.v3i11.1571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i2.35975

J. D. Susatyono, “Kecerdasan Buatan: Kajian Konsep dan Penerapan,” Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, pp. 1–151, Apr. 2021.

R. Alief and E. Nurmiati, “Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan Dan Teknologi Informasi Pada Efisiensi Manajemen Pengetahuan,” Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2022, doi: 10.14710/jmasif.13.1.43760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmasif.13.1.43760

A. C. Dewanto, “Risiko Dan Mitigasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Bidang Pendidikan,” Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 4, pp. 1–10, 2023.

S. Masrichah, “Ancaman dan Peluang Artificial Intelligence (AI),” Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 83–101, 2023, doi: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i3.1860

R. Pakpahan, “Analisa Pengaruh Implementasi Artificial,” Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 506–513, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.52362/jisicom.v5i2.616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v5i1.465

D. Suryanto, “Etika Penelitian,” Berkala Arkeologi, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2005, doi: 10.30883/jba.v25i1.906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v25i1.906

D. Schlagwein and L. Willcocks, “‘ChatGPT et al.’: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 232–238, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1177/02683962231200411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231200411

D. Susilawati, E. Budi, and U. Sudarmaji, “Digitalisasi Layanan Kaji Etik: Sebuah Studi Tata Kelola Komite Etik Penelitian | Susilawati | Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia,” Jurnal Etika Kedokteran indonesia, vol. 5, no. December, pp. 57–62, 2021.

and M. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, “Fostering Integrity in Research,” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2017. doi: 10.17226/21896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/21896

M. S. Anderson, E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson, “Extending the mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 366–393, May 2010, doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779057

E. R. Syafitri and W. Nuryono, “Studi Kepustakaan Teori Konseling ‘Dialectical Behavior Therapy,’” Jurnal Unesa, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2022.

D. P. Abadi, Moch. S. Nuha, H. Indreswari, and Y. Hotifah, “Perspektif Positivisme Vs Post-Positivisme Dalam Memandang Ilmu Pengetahuan Bebas Nilai Serta Implikasinya Dalam Bimbingan Dan Konseling,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional SEHATI ABDIMAS, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 130–138, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.47767/sehati_abdimas.v6i1.676.

Ardiansyah, Risnita, and M. S. Jailani, “Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif,” Jurnal IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57

Moch. S. Nuha, N. Hidayah, and Y. Hotifah, “Peran Konselor Dalam Menyiapkan Peserta Didik Menghadapi Tantangan Kurikulum Merdeka Ditinjau Dari Paradigma Konstruktivisme,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional OPPSI 2023, vol. 2, pp. 44–51, Dec. 2023.

A. Indasah and J. S. Ningrum, “Studi Kepustakaan: Peran Konselor dalam Meningkatkan Perilaku Mencari Bantuan Psikologis,” Annual Guidance and Counseling Academic Forum, 2023.

I. N. Asyifa, N. Surur, and A. T. Susilo, “Studi Kepustakaan Penerapan Art Therapy dalam Bimbingan dan Konseling,” Jurnal Psikoedukasi dan Konseling, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 54, 2022, doi: 10.20961/jpk.v5i2.52091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpk.v5i2.52091

S. Watkins, “Artificial Intelligence: A Boon or a Bane for Educational Leaders in Educational Research,” Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 74–75, 2018, doi: 10.1002/jls.21601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21601

R. R. Parse, “Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Education and Research,” Nursing Science Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 213–214, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1177/08943184231172610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231172610

S. O. Sihombing, Transformasi Penelitian Ilmiah: Mengoptimalkan Metode Penelitian dengan Kecerdasan Buatan. PT Nasya Expanding Management, 2023.

R. Setiabudy, “Etika Penelitian: Apa Dan Bagaimana?,” Majalah Kedokteran Andalas, vol. 37, pp. 20–25, 2015.

R. Rusyanti, “Pengaruh Sikap Skeptisme Auditor, Profesionalisme Auditor dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jakarta Utara),” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2010.

O. Hallonsten, “On the essential role of organized skepticism in science’s ‘internal and lawful autonomy’ (Eigengesetzlichkeit),” Journal of Classical Sociology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 282–303, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1468795X211000247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211000247

R. Kawuwung, “Skeptisisme - Tinjauan Sederhana Perspektif Epistemologis,” 2018, Academia.

M. Hamdi, “Paradigma dan Etika Penelitian,” Universitas Terbuka, pp. 1–66, 2020.

S. Cohen and D. Queen, “Generative artificial intelligence community of practice for research,” International Wound Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1817–1818, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1111/iwj.14274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14274

Saidin and M. S. Jailani, “Memahami Etika Dalam Penelitian Ilmiah,” Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2023, doi: 10.61104/jq.v1i1.51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v1i1.51