Comparative Analysis of Cash Management Internal Controls in the Selected DepEd Schools Division in the Province of Albay, Philippines

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002239


Keywords:

Administrative Capacity, Audit Observations, Digital Infrastructure, Financial Controls, Public Sector Finance

Abstract

The research sought to evaluate and strengthen the Cash Management Internal Controls (CMICs) within the Department of Education (DepEd) Region V. Using a descriptive‑evaluative, explanatory sequential mixed‑methods design, the study evaluated financial practices, regulatory compliance, and operational challenges across selected school division offices and implementing units. Findings revealed a highly effective and consistently compliant internal control environment, characterized by strong clerical performance and strict adherence to national standards such as UACS coding. Core strengths included clear authorization hierarchies and pre‑audit functions, which achieved near‑perfect evaluative scores. However, a significant infrastructure–process gap emerged: While bookkeeping was accurate, the organization remained operationally exposed due to inadequate physical safeguards, including the lack of fireproof vaults and secure transport vehicles. The study also identified a digital‑infrastructure paradox wherein high staff competency was undermined by external systemic risks, including poor internet connectivity, delays in the release of Notices of Cash Allocation (NCAs), and administrative capacity gaps that led to process fatigue. These bottlenecks correlate with the receipt of Audit Observation Memoranda (AOMs) received. Recommendations focused on shifting from primarily administrative training to capital investment. Key proposals included procuring secure logistics and fireproof storage, hiring additional administrative support, and fully transitioning to the Budget and Treasury Management System (BTMS) to automate reconciliations and enhance long‑term financial efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aily A. Alcera, University of Santo Tomas-Legazpi

is the Administrative Officer V-Cashier III and Section Head for the Cash Section at the Department of Education Regional Office V, Regional Center Site Rawis Legazpi City.  She oversees all financial operations for the Regional Office (RO), ensuring fiscal responsibility through efficient collections, timely disbursements, and accurate financial reporting.  Her team is committed to upholding all government obligations with precision, adhering to the highest standards of accounting and auditing compliance. (email: aily_a2@yahoo.com.ph).

References

Department of Education, “Guidelines on the revised implementation of the new school based management (SBM) guidelines and policies on the use of school maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) and other funds,” DepEd Order No. 008, s. 2019, 2019.

Department of Education, “Procedural guidelines to COA, DBM, and DepEd Joint Circular No. 2019-1,” DepEd Order No. 029, s. 2019, 2019.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Internal Control—Integrated Framework. COSO, 2013.

Department of Budget and Management, Philippine Public Financial Management Reforms Roadmap (2024–2028). Department of Budget and Management, 2024.

J. R. Taguinod, “Strengthening financial performance: The role of internal control systems in micro and small enterprises,” International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2025.

S. J. Orillosa, E. J. Arroyo, J. Rebonza, and T. A. Iphan, “The role of internal controls in enhancing financial performance: Evidence from multipurpose cooperatives in the 1st District of Cotabato Province, Philippines,” unpublished.

Department of Budget and Management, PFM Reforms Roadmap 2024–2028: Blueprint for Achieving Our Agenda for Prosperity. Department of Budget and Management, 2024.

Department of Budget and Management, “National Budget Circular No. 595 (NBC 595),” 2025.

PEFA, Philippines 2025 Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment. PEFA Secretariat, 2025.

Department of Budget and Management, Republic of the Philippines Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Assessment Report: 15 April 2025. Department of Budget and Management, 2025.

Department of Budget and Management, National Government Disbursement Performance: September 2025 Report. Government of the Philippines, 2025.

World Bank, World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. World Bank Group, 2018.

World Bank, Second Digital Transformation Development Policy Loan: Program Document, Rep. No. PAD5957. World Bank Group, 2023.

World Bank, “World Bank helps boost digital transformation in PH,” Nov. 12, 2024.

Department of Education, “Revised guidelines on the proper release, utilization, and liquidation of maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) of schools,” DepEd Order, 2019.

Department of Education, “On the CY 2020 consolidated annual audit report,” Aug. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: Department of Education Philippines

Annual Audit Reports (AAR), Consolidated Financial Statements of the Department of Education. Commission on Audit, 2019–2023.

W. Cheng and Y. Kim, “Internal control practices of the Provincial Government of Davao del Norte,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.37264

I. M. García Sánchez and J. Martínez Ferrero, “Financial performance and corporate governance: A review and future research agenda,” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 43, pp. 110–129, 2017.

World Bank, Assessing Basic Education Service Delivery in the Philippines: Public Education Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Study. World Bank Group, 2017.

J. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

L. Donaldson and J. H. Davis, “Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns,” Australian Journal of Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103

K. M. Eisenhardt, “Agency theory: An assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258191

B. Panda and N. M. Leepsa, “Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives,” Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–95, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

T. Schillemans, “Moving beyond the principal–agent model of accountability,” Public Management Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 541–562, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.691008

C. C. Chikere and J. Nwoka, “The systems theory of management in modern day organizations: A study of its relevance and applications,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1–7, 2015.

C. Mele, J. Pels, and F. Polese, “A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications,” Service Science, vol. 2, nos. 1–2, pp. 126–135, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126

M. Wade and J. Hulland, “The resource based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 107–142, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626

D. J. Janvrin, E. A. Payne, and C. Tibke, “Modernizing internal control: The COSO internal control integrated framework,” The CPA Journal, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 16–21, 2012.

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE, 2018.

A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. SAGE, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick, “Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice,” Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

A. Wijaya and M. I. Al Faruq, “Strengthening cash management through effective internal control systems,” Journal of Management and Finance, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2021, doi: 10.391085331.

M. M. Hanafi and A. Halim, Analisis Laporan Keuangan, 5th ed. UPP STIM YKPN, 2016.

Stage Security, “The gold standard of cash transportation safety,” 2025. [Online]. Available: Stage Security

New Jersey Society of CPAs, “Why segregation of duties is essential for internal control,” Sep. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: New Jersey Society of CPAs

A. M. A. Abushiba and M. Al Abbas, “The impact of unified account code structure on financial reporting quality in public sector entities,” International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 45–58, 2020.

M. S. Oladimeji, “Internal control system and financial accountability in the public sector,” Journal of Accounting and Strategic Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2021.

Association of Government Accountants, Best Practices for Audit Readiness in Public Agencies. 2025.

L. W. Vona, Fraud Risk Assessment: Building a Fraud Audit Program. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

O. Arwinge, Internal Control: A Study of Concept and Themes. Springer, 2020.

Department of Budget and Management, “Enhanced guidelines on the adoption and use of the Budget and Treasury Management System (BTMS) for budget execution,” Circular Letter No. 2025-8, 2025.

Volopay, “Smart corporate cards for businesses in the Philippines,” 2025. [Online]. Available: Volopay Philippines

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Alcera, A. A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Cash Management Internal Controls in the Selected DepEd Schools Division in the Province of Albay, Philippines. Jurnal Genesis Indonesia, 5(02), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002239

Plaudit