Understanding the Use of EduTech in Schools in the Philippines: Recommendations for Effectiveness

Al-Rashiff Hamjilani Mastul; Claze Therese de Vera; Cristina Beltran Jayme

doi:10.56741/esl.v2i02.307

Authors

Al-Rashiff Hamjilani Mastul Western Mindanao State University
Claze Therese de Vera
claze.devera@unc.edu.ph
University of Nueva Caceres
Cristina Beltran Jayme Talisayan National High School

Keywords:

acceptance, education, ICT, Philippines

Abstract

This article focuses on the utilization of educational technology in schools in the Philippines. The aim of the study is to provide recommendations for the effective use of EduTech in schools. The article takes a qualitative approach in presenting the author's perspective and opinion, supported by relevant literature. Educational technology is a phenomenon that is transforming the educational system of every school in the Philippines. However, there are several barriers to the effective implementation of EduTech, such as lack of infrastructure, teacher training, funding, digital divide, resistance to change, and technical difficulties. The article emphasizes the need for comprehensive and well-funded efforts to support the implementation and utilization of EduTech in schools in the Philippines. The study concludes that it is essential to educate teachers on the use of EduTech to ensure its effective implementation. Schools must also have adequate budgetary allocation to accommodate the use of technologies in instruction, and the digital divide between schools must be addressed to ensure that everyone has equal access to educational technology. Administrators should take the lead in promoting the use of EduTech in schools and creating an atmosphere that influences everyone to make use of these materials. By doing so, teachers and learners will be better equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary to thrive in the ever-evolving digital world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Q. Pearl Villalon Tomaro, “ICT integration in the educational system of Philippines,” Journal of Governance and Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.18196/jgpp.5399.

R. Aslam, N. Khan, and U. Ahmed, “Technology Integration and Teachers’ Professional Knowledge with Reference to International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)-Standard: A Causal Study,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.22555/joeed.v7i2.31.

Q. Li, “Student and Teacher Views About Technology,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 377–397, 2007, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2007.10782488.

Z. Fajri, H. Baharun, C. Muali, Shofiatun, L. Farida, and Y. Wahyuningtiyas, “Student’s Learning Motivation and Interest; The Effectiveness of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1899, no. 1, p. 012178, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012178.

N. A. Jogezai, F. A. Baloch, and S. A. M. M. Ismail, “Hindering and enabling factors towards ICT integration in schools: A developing country perspective,” İlköğretim Online, pp. 1537–1547, 2020, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.733176.

M. T. Machmud, A. P. Widiyan, and N. R. Ramadhani, “The development and policies of ICT supporting educational technology in Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, and Myanmar,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), vol. 10, no. 1, p. 78, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20786.

Ngabiyanto, A. Nurkhin, Widiyanto, I. H. Saputro, and A. M. Kholid, “Teacher’s intention to use online learning; an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) investigation,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1783, no. 1, p. 012123, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012123.

E. Taja-on, R. Miras, and C. Jurolan, “E-Learning: Teaching Effectiveness to Conventional Teaching in Undergraduates amid COVID-19 Pandemic,” OAlib, vol. 08, no. 11, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1108124.

D. Opoku, F. Pobee, and R. Owusu Okyireh, “Determinants of E-Learning System Adoption among Ghanaian University Lecturers: An Application of Information System Success and Technology Acceptance Models,” American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 151–168, 2020, doi: 10.20448/801.51.151.168.

S. Olanike, A. A. Azeta, I. A. Chiazo, and N. Omoregbe, “Predicting the Adoption of E-Learning Management System: A Case of Selected Private Universities in Nigeria,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, pp. 106–106, 2017, doi: 10.17718/tojde.306563.

E. Ansong, S. Lovia Boateng, and R. Boateng, “Determinants of E-Learning Adoption in Universities,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 30–60, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0047239516671520.

E. C. Avila, G. J. Abin, G. A. Bien, D. M. Acasamoso, and D. D. Arenque, “Students’ Perception on Online and Distance Learning and their Motivation and Learning Strategies in using Educational Technologies during COVID-19 Pandemic,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1933, no. 1, p. 012130, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012130.

L. Nuraeni, R. Purwasih, and J. Mutakim, “IKIP Siliwangi student’s perceptions of online teaching and learning process during COVID-19 pandemic?,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1657, no. 1, p. 012084, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012084.

Ahmad et al., “Student Responses During Online Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic Period,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1764, no. 1, p. 012125, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012125.

S. Y. Harunasari, R. Dwigustini, N. Halim, and S. Susillawati, “University Students’ Acceptance of Online Learning During the Pandemic in Indonesia,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 396–406, 2021, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.491.

E. Surahman and E. Sujarwanto, “Physics undergraduate students’ perceptions of online learning during the transition period to the new normal era,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1869, no. 1, p. 012159, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012159.

A. C. M. Nafrees, A. M. F. Roshan, A. S. N. Baanu, M. N. F. Nihma, and F. H. A. Shibly, “Awareness of Online Learning of Undergraduates during COVID 19 with special reference to South Eastern University of Sri Lanka,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1712, no. 1, p. 012010, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1712/1/012010.

V. E. Ndawi, K. A. Thomas, and T. L. Nyaruwata, “Barriers to effective integration of information and communication technology in Harare Secondary schools,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 211–2016, 2013, doi: 10.24214/jecet.b.6.2.7179.

O. Lee and K. Jo, “Preservice Classroom Teachers’ Identity Development in Learning to Teach Physical Education,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 627–635, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40299-016-0290-5.

W. Chen, J. M. Ho, and D. F. S. Ng, “Erratum to: School Leadership in ICT Implementation: Perspectives from Singapore,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 313–313, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0068-y.

N. A. Razak, H. Ab Jalil, S. E. Krauss, and N. A. Ahmad, “Teachers’ Successful Information and Communication Technology Integration in Primary School,” International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 0–0, 2021, doi: 10.4018/ijicte.20211001oa04.

A. H. K. Yuen and W. W. K. Ma, “Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 229–243, 2008, doi: 10.1080/13598660802232779.

T. Teo, “Validation of the technology acceptance measure for pre‐service teachers (TAMPST) on a Malaysian sample,” Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 163–172, 2010, doi: 10.1108/17504971011075165.