Growth Mindset in Educational Psychology
Between Conceptual Promise and Pedagogical Misuse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.bei.002303
Keywords:
critical perspective, educational psychology, growth mindset, learning theory, motivation, resilience
Abstract
Growth mindset has been widely embraced in educational psychology as a construct that promotes motivation, resilience, and academic persistence. However, its rapid diffusion into educational practice has been accompanied by conceptual dilution and pedagogical misuse. This opinion article critically examines the contemporary deployment of growth mindset in educational settings, arguing that it has increasingly been reduced to a motivational slogan detached from instructional quality, assessment systems, and institutional responsibility. Drawing on educational psychology and learning sciences literature, the article problematizes individualistic and decontextualized interpretations of growth mindset and highlights the risks of moralizing effort while obscuring structural inequities. Rather than rejecting the construct, this paper calls for a critical re-engagement with growth mindset as a theoretically grounded, context-sensitive, and pedagogically accountable framework. The article contributes to ongoing debates in educational psychology by questioning prevailing assumptions and urging a more rigorous conceptualization of growth mindset in research and practice.
Downloads
References
C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY, USA: Random House, 2006.
C. S. Dweck, “Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development,” Psychol. Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000.
D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302–314, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
S. J. Burgoyne, E. A. Hamlin, and D. S. Yeager, “What does growth mindset research really show? A critical review,” Psychol. Sci. Public Interest, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2020.
J. Hattie and K. Zierer, Ten mindframes for visible learning: Teaching for success, Routledge, 2020.
A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: Freeman, 1997.
R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, Art. no. 101860, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2018.
T. Perry, R. Davies, and J. Brady, “Using culturally responsive teaching to support resilience,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1181–1207, 2021.
B. Weiner, “Attribution theory: Retrospect and prospect,” Motivation Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.
S. J. Ball, “The education debate revisited,” Policy Futures Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 421–438, 2021.
L. Bardach, K. C. Bostwick, T. Fütterer, M. Kopatz, D. M. Hobbi, R. M. Klassen, and J. Pietschnig, “A meta-analysis on teachers’ growth mindset,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 36, no. 3, Art. no. 84, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10648-024-09959-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09925-7
D. S. Yeager et al., “A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement,” Nature, vol. 573, pp. 364–369, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978. (Grand theory)
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health,” Can. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 182–185, 2008, doi: 10.1037/a0012801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, Self-regulated learning and performance,” Routledge, 2021.
J. Biggs and C. Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 5th ed. Maidenhead, UK: Open Univ. Press, 2022.
M. Taguma, E. Feron, and M. H. Lim, Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual Learning Framework. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
R. J. Sternberg, “Adaptive intelligence and educational reform,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 243–255, 2021.
M. Alvesson and S. Sveningsson, Changing Organizational Culture: Cultural Change Work in Progress, 3rd ed. London, UK: Routledge, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003474555-2
D. Wiliam, “Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge,” Educ. Assess. Eval. Account., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 571–593, 2021.
T. S. Kuh et al., “Reframing student success in postsecondary education,” Change, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 8–15, 2021.
D. H. Schunk, P. R. Pintrich, and J. L. Meece, Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, 2010.
P. Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY, USA: Continuum, 1970.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marini Abd Razak, Hamidah Mohamad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-07-11
Published 2026-07-21










