Ethical Communication in School Public Relations: A Qualitative Case Study in an Indonesian Primary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.pbpsp.002387
Keywords:
Communication Ethics, Dialogic Communication School, Public Relations, School–Family Communication, Stakeholder Participation, WhatsApp
Abstract
This study examines how communication ethics is practiced in public-relations interactions between SDN Lidah Wetan 2, a public elementary school in East Java, Indonesia, and its stakeholders. Drawing on dialogic communication as an analytical lens, it considers the intersection of respect, message clarity, responsiveness, stakeholder voice, and the affordances and limits of digital communication. A qualitative descriptive design involved eight purposively selected participants (one principal, two teachers, one public-relations-related staff member, and four parents); the original study reports observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentary material analyzed through an interactive process of reduction, display, and interpretation. Available accounts show courteous wording, attempts to respond to questions, and frequent use of class WhatsApp groups. They also reveal uneven understanding, delayed responses, and constraints on face-to-face interaction. The analysis distinguishes the efficient dissemination of information from meaningful reciprocal dialogue and proposes a four-dimension practice framework: respect, clarity, responsiveness, and inclusion. The findings identify plausible conditions for relational trust rather than demonstrate an increase in trust. As a single-school account with limited reproduced interview and documentary evidence, the study offers context-bound insights and priorities for more transparent school communication.
Downloads
References
S. Johari, W. N. W. Noordin, and T. E. T. Mahamad, “WhatsApp conversations and relationships: A focus on digital communication between parent–teacher engagement in a secondary school in Putrajaya,” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 280–296, 2022, doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3802-17.
N. A. K. A. F. Khoo, S. Osman, M. F. Daud, J. A. Kumar, and D. Kurniati, “The implications of digital communication between parents and teachers from a teachers’ point of view,” Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 2024, doi: 10.69598/hasss.24.1.261660.
R. F. Bataineh, R. Bataineh, A. Al-Barakat, and R. AlAli, “WhatsApp as a mediational infrastructure: Informal parental involvement and pedagogical drift in Jordanian primary education,” Digital Education Review, no. 48, pp. 157–173, 2026.
T. E. Smith, S. R. Holmes, M. E. Romero, and S. M. Sheridan, “Evaluating the effects of family–school engagement interventions on parent–teacher relationships: A meta-analysis,” School Mental Health, vol. 14, pp. 278–293, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09510-9.
M. Monfrance, C. Haelermans, H. Leenders, J. de Jong, and K. Coppens, “Parental engagement in primary education: Differences in teacher perceptions and parent–teacher communication explained,” Teachers and Teaching, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1282–1297, 2025, doi: 10.1080/13540602.2024.2397581.
L. A. Wheeler et al., “Parent–teacher relationships: Factors that relate to dyadic congruence,” The Elementary School Journal, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 132–150, 2024, doi: 10.1086/731239.
G. Mann, L. Gilmore, A. Robertson, L. Kennedy-Wood, and L. Maia-Pike, “Little things mean a lot: Parent perspectives on positive teacher–parent communication when students have disability,” Teachers and Teaching, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 102–115, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13540602.2023.2241020.
S. J. Mujtaba, J. Kigobe, and K. Van Leeuwen, “Parental involvement in primary schools in Tanzania: Effects of a pre- and in-service teacher training,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 140, Art. no. 104459, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104459.
C. Jones and O. Palikara, “How do parents and school staff conceptualize parental engagement? A primary school case study,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, Art. no. 990204, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.990204.
T. Moreira, J. Martins, C. Silva, E. Berrocal de Luna, J. Martins, D. Moreira, and P. Rosário, “Building partnerships in education through a story-tool based intervention: Parental involvement experiences among families with Roma backgrounds,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, Art. no. 1012568, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1012568.
K. Liu, Y. Zhao, M. Li, W. Li, and Y. Yang, “Parents’ perception or children’s perception? Parental involvement and student engagement in Chinese middle schools,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 977678, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977678.
Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Zhou, Y. Tian, W. Li, and H. Xie, “Parent–adolescent discrepancies in educational expectations, relationship quality, and study engagement: A multi-informant study using response surface analysis,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, Art. no. 1288644, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1288644.
G. Liu, Z. Jin, X. Zheng, Z. Wang, and W. Liu, “Associations between teacher–parent relationships and preschool children’s social behavior problems: The chain mediating roles of work–family conflict and parenting self-efficacy,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, Art. no. 1349652, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349652.
L. Cai, P. Huang, and Y. Guo, “Relationship between parental involvement and children’s positive mental character during early years: The moderating role of parent–teacher relationship and teacher–parent relationship,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, Art. no. 1438784, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1438784.
T. Ma, C. L. Tellegen, and M. R. Sanders, “The role of parenting self-efficacy on teacher–child relationships and parent–teacher communication: Evidence from an Australian national longitudinal study,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 103, Art. no. 101296, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101296.
J. Goulet, I. Archambault, E. Olivier, and J. Morizot, “Externalizing behaviors and student engagement: Exploring the protective role of parental involvement in school using latent moderated structural equation modeling,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 107, Art. no. 101365, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101365.
X. Xia, “Parental involvement and Chinese children’s cognitive and social-emotional school readiness: Differential effects across family socioeconomic status,” Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 161, Art. no. 107647, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107647.
Y. Muchnik-Rozanov and O. Levin, “Bridging the gap between preservice teachers’ theoretical and practical knowledge through simulations of teacher–parent interactions,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 52, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2024.2414815.
B. Boruah, P. Phogat, and A. Singh, “A qualitative exploration of parent–teacher meetings in Indian schools: Assessing stakeholder engagement and systemic efficacy,” Education 3–13, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03004279.2024.2424260.
G. F. Azad, I. Taormina, V. Herrera, and Y. Zhang, “Communication training within Partners in School: Feasibility, acceptability, and usability,” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 239–264, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10474412.2024.2341382.
G. Pusztai, Z. Demeter-Karászi, E. Major, and M. Puskás, “Beyond the barriers of deficit orientedness? Comparing distinct teacher approaches of parental involvement,” British Journal of Religious Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 370–388, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01416200.2024.2388133.
Z. Haque and D. Wallace, “Stronger together: Race, power, and parent–teacher partnership in the COVID-19 era,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, doi: 10.1080/01419870.2024.2411423.
S. K. Ahmed, “The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research,” Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, vol. 2, Art. no. 100051, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051.
R. H. Adler, “Trustworthiness in qualitative research,” Journal of Human Lactation, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 598–602, 2022, doi: 10.1177/08903344221116620.
E. Schmid, V. Garrels, and B. Skåland, “The continuum of rapport: Ethical tensions in qualitative interviews with vulnerable participants,” Qualitative Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1253–1271, 2024, doi: 10.1177/14687941231224600.
W. Yan, L. C. Jiang, Y. Gao, and P. Jia, “What do we mean by transparency? Conceptualizing and operationalizing transparency in communication,” Communication Research, 2026, doi: 10.1177/00936502261470088.
Z. Lu and S. C. Sanders-Smith, “Hidden boundaries: A case study of perspectives on family–school partnerships in a multicultural classroom,” Early Childhood Education Journal, early access, Aug. 29, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10643-026-02338-x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alfiyan Nur Falah, Nuphanudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







