Exploring the Use and Cultural Significance of Bimanese Idioms in Social Interactions Case Study at LDK AL Muhajirin at STKIP Taman Siswa Bima Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ramli
Ade Irma

Abstract

This research investigates the use and types of Bimanese idioms within the social interactions of LDK AL Muhajirin at STKIP Taman Siswa Bima. Employing a descriptive qualitative methodology, the study examines four recorded interactions and 3 study sessions, revealing 26 instances where Bimanese idioms were utilized. These idiomatic expressions were associated with various pragmatic speech acts, including illocutionary, elocutionary, and perlocutionary acts, involving 17 speakers and 41 listeners. Furthermore, the research categorizes these idioms into distinct types, emphasizing their cultural significance. "Kalemboade" or "lemboade" emerged as the most frequently used idiom, followed by "maja" and "dahu," indicative of broader Bima cultural values, often referred to as "dou mbojo motto." However, the study also highlights the dwindling awareness of certain idioms, such as " ncewi mbei adem," among younger generations. These findings provide valuable insights into the role of Bimanese expressions in social discourse, shedding light on their cultural relevance and evolving use among different age groups. This research contributes to understanding linguistic dynamics within specific cultural contexts and underscores the importance of preserving linguistic heritage in an ever-changing linguistic landscape.

Keywords:

Cultural, Bimanese Idioms, Social Interactions

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Ramli, STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

is a lecturer at STKIP Tamansiswa Bima, located in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. He specializes in English language education. He earned his master's degree in English Language Education from the State University of Makassar. He has contributed to several articles published in both national and international journals. (email: ramlialfatih88@gmail.com).

Ade Irma, Universitas Musamus

is a lecturer at Musamus University in Merauke, Papua, Indonesia. Her expertise lies in the field of linguistics. She obtained her master's degree in English Language Education from Ahmad Dahlan University. Ade's experience with indigenous communities has made her an expert in linguistics, particularly in its application to community contexts. (email: adeirmairfan@gmail.com).

How to Cite
Ramli, & Irma, A. (2024). Exploring the Use and Cultural Significance of Bimanese Idioms in Social Interactions: Case Study at LDK AL Muhajirin at STKIP Taman Siswa Bima . Jurnal Genesis Indonesia, 3(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56741/jgi.v3i01.442

Plaudit

References

  1. Richards, J., and Schmidt, R. (2003). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education.
  2. Levinson, SC (1983). Pragmatis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  3. Kridalaksana, H. (2013). Kamus Linguistik (edisi keempat). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  4. Nababan. P. W. J. (1987). Ilmu Pragmatik. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  5. Purwo, B. K. (1990). Pragmatik dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta
  6. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: the state of ELT and the way forward. England: Hove,. Language Teaching Publications.
  7. Keraf, G. (2005). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka.
  8. Salvador, L. L. (1997). Assimilation, imitation and the elementary social fact: Towards a definition of social interactions. In Working notes of Socially Intelligent Agents Workshop, AAAI Press, AAAI Fall Symposium Serie (pp. 115-117).
  9. Argyle, M. (2017). Social interaction: process and products. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129556
  10. Tarigan, H. G. (1993). Pengajaran Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
  11. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in society, 13(2), 145-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X
  12. Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223
  13. Rajagukguk, R., Malems, T., & Ginting, M. (2022). Preserving Linguistic Diversity: Strategies for Language Preservation and Cultural Heritage Safeguarding. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 11(3), 221-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v11i3.25
  14. Kroskrity, P. V., & Field, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian country. University of Arizona Press.
  15. Demssie, Y. N., Biemans, H. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2020). Combining indigenous knowledge and modern education to foster sustainability competencies: Towards a set of learning design principles. Sustainability, 12(17), 6823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176823
  16. Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.