The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning for Increasing Learning Outcomes and Reducing Anxiety in Elementary School Mathematics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v2i02.283


Keywords:

Anxiety, Contextual Teaching and Learning, Elementary Education, Learning Outcome

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in reducing and improving learning outcomes and math anxiety among students at a private elementary school in Indonesia. The research utilized a one-group control pre-posttest design with a sample of 51 4th-grade  students. The study used a combination of pre-test and post-test and a closed-ended questionnaire as the data collection instruments. The independent variable in the study was CTL, while the dependent variables were learning outcomes and math anxiety. The paired t-test showed a significant increase in the students' average learning outcomes and a decrease in the average math anxiety levels. The findings suggest that implementing CTL is a practical approach to reducing math anxiety and improving student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Farida Yunitasari, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is a student of Elementary School Teacher Education at Ahmad Dahlan University. She has always been active in student activities, especially those related to school and community development. She has been actively involved in various student organizations and volunteer programs. She is known for her dedication and hard work in organizing events and activities that aim to empower communities and promote education. As a student of Elementary School Teacher Education, she is preparing herself to become a dedicated and compassionate educator who will make a positive impact on the lives of her students. (email: Avivah1700000513@webmail.uad.ac.id).

Mukti Sintawati, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

is a lecturer at Ahmad Dahlan University. She was born and raised in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. After completing her undergraduate studies at Yogyakarta State University in 2011, she continued her education and obtained her Master's degree from the same university in 2015. She has a background in Elementary School Teacher Education. She is also actively involved in various research and curriculum development activities in the field of elementary education. She always strives to remain active and involved in social activities in her community. (email: mukti.sintawati@pgsd.uad.ac.id).

Al-Rashiff Hamjilani Mastul, Western Mindanao State University

is pursuing Doctoral degree at College of Education, Western Mindanao State University, Philippines. His undergraduate and mster degree are from MSU Tawi-Tawi College of Technology and Oceanography. He has disciplines in Teacher Education, Educational Technology, and Teaching Methods focusing in Pre-Service Teachers. Now, he lives in Zamboanga, Philipines. (email: Al-Rashiff.mastul@deped.gov.ph).

References

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students' mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315.

Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 135-151). Springer International Publishing.

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Routledge.

Belecina, R. R., & Ocampo Jr, J. M. (2018). Effecting change on students' critical thinking in problem-solving. Educare, 10(2), 109-118.

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113.

Baten, E., Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2017). The relevance and efficacy of metacognition for instructional design in the domain of mathematics. ZDM, 49, 613-623.

Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher education research & development, 37(1), 58-71.

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517-528.

Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425-469.

Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: What really matters?. British educational research journal, 41(5), 731-748.

Devine, A., Hill, F., Carey, E., & Szűcs, D. (2018). Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 431-444.

Cipora, K., Szczygieł, M., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Math anxiety assessment with the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: Applicability and usefulness: Insights from the Polish adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1833, 1-16.

Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. (2016). Beyond math anxiety: Positive emotions predict mathematics achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 415-422.

Baid, H. (2020). Engaging with grounded theory research as a doctoral student. In Critical Qualitative Health Research (pp. 91-109). Routledge.

Thota, N. (2015). Connectivism and the use of technology/media in collaborative teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(142), 81-96.

Suadiyatno, T., Firman, E., Hanan, A., & Sumarsono, D. (2020). Examining the effect of contextual teaching-learning and anxiety towards students’ speaking skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(1), 100-107.

Fernando, S. Y., & Marikar, F. M. (2017). Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110-122.

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-14

How to Cite

Yunitasari, F., Sintawati, M., & Mastul, A.-R. H. (2023). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning for Increasing Learning Outcomes and Reducing Anxiety in Elementary School Mathematics. International Journal of Learning Reformation in Elementary Education, 2(02), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v2i02.283

Plaudit