The Functionality of Child Protection Policy in Public Secondary Schools
A Study at the Division of Albay, Philippines
Keywords:
Child Protection Committees, Child Protection Policy, Implementation Challenges, Policy Implementation, Public Secondary SchoolsAbstract
This study assessed the level of functionality of Child Protection Policy (CPP) implementation in public secondary schools in the Schools Division of Albay during the school year 2024–2025. This study employed a descriptive-correlational quantitative research design. The respondents consisted of 92 designated guidance coordinators and guidance counselors, while 60 respondents participated in the survey on the challenges encountered in policy implementation. The gathered data were analyzed using frequency count, weighted mean, and F-test or Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The findings revealed that CPP was generally partially functional across the five major categories used in assessing implementation processes. It was found that schools have already created basic structures and processes for the Child Protection Committees (CPCs); nevertheless, many other aspects were still considered to be in the initial developmental stages, especially with respect to resource generation, child participation, monitoring, and capacity building. Components under service delivery, such as the referral system and case management, performed relatively better than others. There was no significant difference in the degree of functionality of CPP based on whether the schools are big or small, and based on the CPP focal person's position designation in the school. Problems that were reported included difficulties in conducting meetings in the CPC, insufficient policies and guidelines, inadequate budget provision, lack of skilled personnel, poor monitoring and evaluation, and inconsistent practices. However, the schools generally considered the need for strengthening the implementation process to protect and promote the welfare of their learners.
References
UNICEF, Child Protection from Violence, Exploitation and Abuse. New York, NY, USA: UNICEF, 2017.
Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 7610: Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act, 1992.
Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 10627: Anti-Bullying Act of 2013, 2013.
Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 9344: Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2006/04/28/republic-act-no-9344-s-2006/
Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 11313: Safe Spaces Act, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2019/04/17/republic-act-no-11313/
Department of Education, DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012: Policy and Guidelines on Protecting Children in School from Abuse, Violence, Exploitation, Discrimination, Bullying and Other Forms of Abuse. Philippines: Department of Education, 2012.
Department of Education, DepEd Order No. 55, s. 2013: Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 10627 (Anti-Bullying Act of 2013). Philippines: Department of Education, 2013.
Department of Education, “Angara convenes largest executive committee to combat bullying,” Apr. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/04/15/angara-convenes-largest-executive-committee-to-combat-bullying/
Council for the Welfare of Children, “CWC: Gov’t received 279,000 reports on abuse of children in 2020,” Apr. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cwc.gov.ph/date/2024/04/27/
S. A. Bayuca, “Teachers’ awareness and school’s responsiveness to the child protection policy: Basis for a development plan,” International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 59–65, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijeais.org/ijamr
R. P. Peralta and D. L. Poja, “Child protection policy and teachers’ confidence in navigating ethical dilemmas: Input for teachers’ welfare program,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 160–247, 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0013.
A. Bowers, L. Smith, and J. Thompson, “School child protection policies and teacher confidence in the United Kingdom,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 105, Art. no. 101711, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101711.
H. Lee and S. Park, “Effects of child protection policy training on teacher disciplinary practices in South Korean schools,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 23, pp. 455–467, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12564-022-09768-5.
American School Counselor Association, Ethical Standards for School Counselors. Alexandria, VA, USA: American School Counselor Association, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.schoolcounselor.org/About-School-Counseling/Ethical-Responsibilities/ASCA-Ethical-Standards-for-School-Counselors-(1)
C. D. Gorman, School-Based Mental Health Initiatives: Challenges and Considerations for Policymakers. New York, NY, USA: Manhattan Institute, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://manhattan-institute.org/school-based-mental-health-initiatives
P. Nguyen and R. Smith, “The role of school counseling programs in student well-being in Australia,” Australian Journal of Education, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 150–165, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0004944120908456.
T. Johnson, M. Allen, and K. Black, “Counseling interventions and student outcomes: Evidence from Canadian schools,” Canadian Journal of Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 612–632, 2021, doi: 10.2307/cjeduc.44.3.612.
J. Haight et al., “Essential conditions for partnership collaboration within a school-community model of wraparound support,” Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 33, pp. 2962–2977, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10826-024-02903-1.
N. A. Masekela, E. T. Ngobeni, and P. Sepeng, “Implementation of school safety policy in primary and secondary schools,” Research in Educational Policy and Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–31, 2024, doi: 10.46303/repam.2024.2.
J. O. Recibe, “Public elementary schools’ extent of implementation and compliance to Philippine DepEd Order No. 40 s. 2012: The Child Protection Policy,” Cagayan State University-Aparri Campus Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024.
A. C. Natividad, “Level of awareness and extent of implementation of the Child Protection Policy in Flora District,” Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 352–371, 2025, doi: 10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i2913.
A. A. Alda, M. L. Bucad, Jr., and D. R. Perez, “Child protection policy in Narra District, Palawan, Philippines,” Studies in Technology and Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.55687/ste.v2i2.67.
J. Cervancia, K. U. Hernandez, M. R. Rodavia, and E. Roxas, “Child abuse and compliance on child protection policy in private and public basic educational institutions,” International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 2019.
G. Aguilar-Rahmat, “Extent of implementation of the guidance program in the public schools of Urdaneta City,” International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 7, 2022.
A. Sulaimon and O. C. Potokri, “Assessment of child protection policy awareness in secondary schools,” EUREKA: Social and Humanities, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.21303/2504-5571.2023.003.
D. Hilts, Y. Liu, and X. Guo, “Student-to-school-counselor ratios, school-level factors, and leadership practices of school counselors: A national investigation,” Journal of School Counseling, vol. 21, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1177/2156759X231182135.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Mhailyn L. Loteriña, Gemma Salando-Clet, Cyril B. Romero

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





