Collaborative Learning Effectiveness in Thai Classrooms: A Cultural Psychology Perspective
Keywords:
Classroom Interaction, Collaborative Learning, Collectivism, Cultural Psychology, ThailandAbstract
Collaborative learning has been widely recognized as an effective pedagogical approach for enhancing student engagement, critical thinking, and academic achievement. However, its effectiveness may vary across cultural contexts. This study examines the effectiveness of collaborative learning in Thai classrooms through a cultural psychology perspective. Drawing on sociocultural theory and cultural dimensions, the study explores how collectivist values, power distance, and interpersonal norms influence students’ participation, interaction, and learning outcomes in group-based learning environments. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining survey data from 280 secondary and undergraduate students with classroom observations and interviews. The findings indicate that collaborative learning is generally effective in promoting engagement and social cohesion, but its impact on critical thinking and individual accountability is moderated by cultural factors. Students tend to prioritize harmony and group consensus, which may limit open disagreement and deep cognitive conflict. The study contributes to the literature by contextualizing collaborative learning within Southeast Asian cultural settings and offers practical implications for designing culturally responsive pedagogy.
References
J. V. Wertsch, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Harvard University Press, 1988. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv26071b0.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045095
J. Bruner, ‘Acts of Meaning’, Psychol. Med., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 531–531, May 1992, doi: 10.1017/s0033291700030555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700030555
R. E. Slavin, ‘Cooperative Learning*’, Int. Encycl. Educ., pp. 177–183, 2010, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00494-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00494-2
R. E. Mayer, ‘Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning’, Camb. Handb. Multimed. Learn., pp. 57–72, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1017/9781108894333.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008
L. Fiorella and R. E. Mayer, Learning as a Generative Activity. Cambridge University Press, 2015. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107707085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085
D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, ‘Cooperative Learning: The Foundation for Active Learning’, Act. Learn. - Future, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.81086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086
M. Cole, ‘Review of Cultural Psychology.’, Contemp. Psychol. J. Rev., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 162–162, Feb. 1983, doi: 10.1037/021834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/021834
R. A. Shweder, ‘Commentary: Ontogenetic Cultural Psychology’, Bridg. Cult. Dev. Approaches Psychol., pp. 303–310, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383430.003.0014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383430.003.0014
G. J. Hofstede, ‘Culture’s causes: the next challenge’, Cross Cult. Manag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 545–569, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1108/ccm-03-2015-0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-03-2015-0040
Z. Moshe Ami, ‘Changes in Thai cultural and social values as reflected in the use of the royal language in Thai newspapers from 1932 to the present time’, Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University. doi: 10.58837/chula.the.2001.1733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2001.1733
D. Junla and S. Yotanyamaneewong, ‘Cultural values, parenting and child adjustment in Thailand’, Int. J. Psychol., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 559–567, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13111
J. Boonsathirakul and C. Kerdsomboon, ‘Synthesis of Critical Thinking Research of Basic Education Level Students Using Meta-Analysis in Thailand during 2010 to 2021.’, Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2022.4287
C. Howe, S. Hennessy, and N. Mercer, ‘Classroom dialogue and student attainment’, Routledge Int. Handb. Res. Dialogic Educ., pp. 182–195, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.4324/9780429441677-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677-16
K. Littleton and N. Mercer, ‘Interthinking: Putting talk to work’, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.4324/9780203809433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809433
‘Collective memory in the digital age’, Prog. Brain Res., pp. 203–226, 2022, doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.001
J. Sweller, ‘The Role of Evolutionary Psychology in Our Understanding of Human Cognition: Consequences for Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Procedures’, Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2229–2241, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09647-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09647-0
R. Saubern, D. Urbach, M. Koehler, and M. Phillips, ‘Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology’, Comput. Educ., vol. 147, p. 103784, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784
C. Candia, J. Pulgar, and F. L. Pinheiro, ‘Interconnectedness in education systems’, in Handbook of Computational Social Science, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2025, pp. 891–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207309.00079
M. Hafeez, ‘Systematic Review on Modern Learning Approaches, Critical Thinking Skills and Students Learning Outcomes’, Indones. J. Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 167, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33192
P. Pathak, A. Sharma, R. Mukherjee, A. Sharma, and R. Garg, ‘Culturally responsive teaching: Strategies for fostering inclusive classrooms’, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 203–215, 2024.
M. F. Tanase, ‘Culturally responsive teaching in urban secondary schools’, Educ. Urban Soc., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 363–388, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211026689
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdulhafiz Hile
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
