The Application of the Technology Readiness Acceptance Model on Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56741/jnest.v2i01.265Keywords:
Educational Technology, School Management, Technology Adoption , Technology ReadinessAbstract
The development of science and technology has changed the work system, including in educational institutions. Rapid information and communication technology changes are now essential factors in changing education management. Improving the quality of education can leverage the quality of a nation. Technology in the teaching field provides many opportunities in various aspects of education and learning, such as academic services, access to learning materials, educational evaluation, management of lesson content, reports on student learning outcomes and the use of digital-based learning media by teachers. The use of technology in learning can create a competitive environment for students and teachers to be more creative and innovative. Education in Technology Study (Edtech) has become a global concern, especially during a pandemic. The revitalization and development of teacher and student synergy in implementing digital technology-based education will accelerate the education revolution 4.0.
Downloads
References
A. Qurtubi, "Educational Management Using E-Learning to Maximize Learning Efficiency and Speed Up the Industrial Revolution 4.0." AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 3, pp 2319-2326, 2019.
R. Castro, “Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2523-2546, 2019.
C. Sánchez-Cruzado, R. Santiago Campión and M. T. Sánchez-Compaña, “Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, 1858, 2021.
H. Damerji and A. Salimi, “Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting,” Accounting Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 107-130, 2021.
S. El Alfy, J. M. Gómez and D. Ivanov, “Exploring instructors’ technology readiness, attitudes and behavioral intentions towards e-learning technologies in Egypt and United Arab Emirates,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, pp. 2605-2627, 2017.
A. J. Romiszowski. “Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design,” Routledge, 2016.
A. Parasuraman and C. L. Colby, “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0,” J Serv Res, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–74, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1094670514539730.
S. N. Faizani and A. D. Indriyanti, “Analisis Pengaruh Technology Readiness terhadap Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease of Use terhadap Behavioral Intention dari Quick Response Indonesian Standard (QRIS) untuk Pembayaran Digital (Studi Kasus: Pengguna Aplikasi e-Wallet Go-Pay, DANA, OVO,” Journal of Emerging Information System and Business Intelligence (JEISBI), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–93, 2021.
M. A. Nugroho and M. Andryzal Fajar, “Effects of Technology Readiness Towards Acceptance of Mandatory Web-Based Attendance System,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 124, pp. 319–328, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.161.
E. Murat and E. Nihat, “Effects of Technology Readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM,” The journal of knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 416–419, 2014.
S. A. Rahman, S. K. Taghizadeh, T. Ramayah, and M. M. D. Alam, “Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 118, pp. 236–245, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.027.
S. Shin and W. J. Lee, “The effects of technology readiness and technology acceptance on NFC mobile payment services in Korea,” Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1615–1626, 2014, doi: 10.19030/jabr.v30i6.8873.
N. Erdoǧmu and M. Esen, “An investigation of the effects of technology readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 24, pp. 487–495, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.131.
R. S. Jaya, I. N. Udayana, and P. D. Cahyani, “Pengaruh Social Influence Dan Personal Innovativeness Terhadap Perceived Usefulness Melalui Behavioral Intention Pengguna Traveloka (Studi Kasus: Pada Mahasiswa Ust Yogyakarta),” Buletin Ekonomi: Manajemen, Ekonomi Pembangunan, Akuntansi, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 35, 2021, doi: 10.31315/be.v18i1.5622.
M. S. Lee, “Effects of personal innovativeness on mobile device adoption by older adults in South Korea: the moderation effect of mobile device use experience,” International Journal of Mobile Communications, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 682, 2019, doi: 10.1504/ijmc.2019.102719.
S. N. Faizani and A. D. Indriyanti, “Analisis pengaruh rechnology readiness terhadap perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use terhadap behavioral intention dari quick response indonesian standard (qris) untuk pembayaran digital (studi kasus: pengguna aplikasi e-wallet go-pay, dana, ovo, dan linkaja di surabaya),” Journal of Emerging Information Systems and Business Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2021, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/JEISBI/article/download/39738/34603
I. E. Tyas and E. S. Darma, “Pengaruh perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment, dan actual usage terhadap penerimaan teknologi informasi: studi empiris pada karyawan bagian akuntansi dan keuangan baitul maal wa tamwilWilayah daerah istimewa yogyakarta dan sekitarnya,” Review Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2017, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/rab
S. Andayani, “Analisis kesiapan penerimaan pengguna terhadap e-learning menggunakan model tram,” Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://forms.gle/gNfzXFVGqxdND14q9
Ahmad, “Persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan, keamanan danketersediaan fitur terhadapminat ulangnasabah bankdalammenggunakaninternet banking(studi pada program layananinternetbankingbri),” Jurnal Studi Manajemen, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2014, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://repository.stei.ac.id/1990/1/Ratna%20Asri%20Saras%20Sati%2021177500443_ArtikelIndonesia.pdf
N. W. Gita and G. Juliarsa, “Persepsi kepercayaan, kegunaan, kemudahan penggunaan, keamanan dan minat ulang menggunakan mobile banking Jenius,” E-Jurnal Akuntansi, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 2086–2090, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i08.p16.
M. W. Adhiputra, “Aplikasi tam dalam pengguna layanan internet,” Jurnal Bisnis dan Komunikasi, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.
T. Y. L. Kuswanto and Z. Baridwan, “Pengaruh kepercayaan, persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan, dan persepsi keamanan terhadap minat penggunaan transaksi online,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Brawijaya, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–29, 2016, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/2680
M. L. Kristianti and R. Pambudi, “Analisis pengaruh persepsi kemudahan, persepsi kemanfaatan, persepsi tingkat keamanan, dan fi tur layanan terhadap penggunaan mobile banking pada mahasiswa di dki jakarta,” Jurnal Akuntansi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 50–67, 2019, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/267907-analisis-pengaruh-persepsi-kemudahan-per-a08abd38.pdf
M. S. Mahardika, A. Fauzi, and Mardi, “Pengaruh kemudahan penggunaan, keamanan dan persepsi risiko terhadap minat penggunaan financial technology (fintech) payment linkaja syariah,” Indonesian Journal of Economy, Business, Entrepreneurship and Finance, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2021, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/267907-analisis-pengaruh-persepsi-kemudahan-per-a08abd38.pdf
K. Keni, “How perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use affecting intent to repurchase?,” Jurnal Manajemen, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 481–477, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.24912/jm.v24i3.680.
A. Abd. Hamid, F. Z. A. Razak, A. A. Bakar, and W. S. W. Abdullah, “The effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on continuance intention to use e-government,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 644–649, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00079-4.
S. Setyo Iriani and A. Lestari Andjarwati, “Analysis of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risk toward online shopping in the era of covid-19 pandemic,” Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 313–320, 2020, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://statik.unesa.ac.id/simia/uploads/file_artikel/file_artikel_e0af0e94-0c65-43ea-9f42-981e714e7c9b.pdf
Z. Baridwan and A. Majid Octavika, “He influence of perceived usefulness, ease of use, behavioral control, security and trust towards the behavioral intention to use go-pay,” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2010, [Online]. Available: www.lazada.co.id
Y. A. Nugroho, “The effect of perceived ease of use, perceive of usefulness, perceive risk and trust towards behavior intention in transaction by internet,” Business and Entrepreneurial Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://www.angkasa-online.com/
A. Abd. Hamid, F. Z. A. Razak, A. A. Bakar, and W. S. W. Abdullah, “The effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on continuance intention to use e-government,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 35, pp. 644–649, 2016, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00079-4.
D. Jatimoyo, F. Rohman, and A. Djazuli, “The effect of perceived ease of use on continuance intention through perceived usefulness and trust,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 430–437, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1223.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Novel Engineering Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
